So Trump is now going to get his way and end birthright citizenship due to a 'stacked' Supreme court

Almost as soon as the Supreme Court released its ruling limiting the ability of judges to block President Donald Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship, challengers brought new legal claims seeking the same result by a different means.



While the Supreme Court said judges cannot issue sweeping "universal injunctions" that can apply nationwide in many cases, it left open the option of plaintiffs seeking broad relief via class action lawsuits.



The American Civil Liberties Union filed such a lawsuit in New Hampshire on behalf of immigrants whose children may not obtain U.S. citizenship at birth if Trump's order was to go into effect.



In a separate case in Maryland, in which groups had previously obtained a nationwide injunction, lawyers filed an amended complaint seeking similar class-wide relief for anyone affected by Trump's plan within hours of the ruling authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.



Under Trump's plan, birthright citizenship would be limited to those who have at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident. That is at odds with the widely accepted understanding of the Constitution's 14th Amendment — that it grants citizenship to anyone born in the U.S., with a few minor exceptions.



Samuel Bray, a critic of nationwide injunctions at Notre Dame Law School whose work was cited in the ruling, said both the states and individual plaintiffs can still get broad injunctions against the birthright citizenship executive order, potentially even on a nationwide basis.



"I don't expect the executive order will ever go into effect," he added.

Does that therefore mean that existing US citizens and permanent residents who are pregnant and give birth outside the mainland or territories will have their child denied citizenship?

No, that's a separate legal issue.

Trump's Executive Order (and the litigation) focused on births occurring inside the United States, redefining who qualifies as “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

Births outside the U.S. (e.g., abroad) are governed by different statutes:

8 U.S.C. §1401(c–g) govern citizenship at birth to U.S. citizen parents abroad.

Children born abroad to U.S. citizens can typically claim citizenship through their parents if residency and physical presence conditions are met.

So unless the Trump administration issues a separate executive order or changes the law affecting foreign births, U.S. citizen or LPR parents who give birth abroad are not affected by EO 14160 or this ruling.

⚖ Bigger Implications

The decision reins in federal district court power and will make it harder to immediately block executive policies nationwide.

It means future challenges to EO 14160 must proceed piecemeal, plaintiff by plaintiff, or via certified class actions under Rule 23.

🗽 Closing Thought

So while this Supreme Court ruling empowers Trump to enforce his EO in cases not covered by the narrowed injunctions, birthright citizenship law still stands—for now. But the court's door remains open for a future merits ruling, which could fundamentally change the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. That’s when we would truly be looking at “North American Korea.”

This round was a test to see if the court could be relied on to toe the line for Project 2025. Wait for the real fun to start soon.. Some nice mid term altering goodies..😷

It sure is and TACO has never been
So pleased with himself.

If people had any guts they would insist that the orange traitor deport his three oldest children before deporting anyone else.