DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
She's more moderate than many may think
Definitely not a socialist given her love for capitalism which she herself stessed.
That is our economics problem however. Capitalism has overrun everything. Harris herself was taking corporate PAK money.
The immigration problem never even existed when Trump took office. The floods had already stopped.
No difference in the wars situations though.
There really is no resolution to the wars.
Definitely not a socialist given her love for capitalism which she herself stessed.
That is our economics problem however. Capitalism has overrun everything. Harris herself was taking corporate PAK money.
The immigration problem never even existed when Trump took office. The floods had already stopped.
No difference in the wars situations though.
There really is no resolution to the wars.
TinyViolins · 31-35, M
I mean, she would still have a Republican-controlled Congress and Supreme Court, so I doubt she could accomplish much even if she wanted to. I predict the biggest change would be that she'd bring back the bipartisan border bill that Trump killed and that would hopefully put a serious dent in the amount of fentanyl coming into the country.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@TinyViolins it would've been centrist to neo-liberal business as usual stuff with some performative allyship.
Still take it over outright fascism though.
Still take it over outright fascism though.
bookerdana · M
Really impossible to say,she had a few months to introduce herself before the election..one thing is certain ,she wouldn't have an unelected unauthorized guy slashing funds Congress had allocated,or the tariff bonus...
ElwoodBlues · M
Harris would be proposing a MUCH smaller deficit than tRump (similar spending but no tax cut) and the GOP would be crying that the sky is falling. Harris would continue to support Ukraine, and Putin would be wanting to negotiate. We wouldn't have started trade wars with almost every nation on Earth.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
I don't think we would be in any of the mess we current are in!
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
OMG, the county wouldn't survive I'm thinking.

SW-User
We were screwed by our choices.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@Diotrephes and what's wrong with that?
Citizens and residents can surely do what they want with their money and resources?
Should imaginary lines in the sand be more important than basic human rights?
Citizens and residents can surely do what they want with their money and resources?
Should imaginary lines in the sand be more important than basic human rights?
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@basilfawlty89 In certain situations citizens become criminals when they do what they want instead of following the law as written.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@Diotrephes lol.
Appeal to Law is a logical fallacy, buddy.
Law is not synonymous with ethics.
In Nazi Germany it was illegal to shelter Jewish and Roma people.
In the Ottoman Empire it was illegal to protect Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks.
If doing the right, just and compassionate thing is "illegal", I'll gladly be labeled a criminal.
Appeal to Law is a logical fallacy, buddy.
Law is not synonymous with ethics.
In Nazi Germany it was illegal to shelter Jewish and Roma people.
In the Ottoman Empire it was illegal to protect Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks.
If doing the right, just and compassionate thing is "illegal", I'll gladly be labeled a criminal.
ShenaniganFoodie · 36-40, M
BUT, the US wouldn't now be hated by every other country in the world
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
Like Clinton, Obama and Biden.
Contrary to the wingnuts, she's not a
"Far left Marxist Leftist Anarchist Socialist Atheist".
She's just a center, run on the mill, milquetoast Democrat.
Contrary to the wingnuts, she's not a
"Far left Marxist Leftist Anarchist Socialist Atheist".
She's just a center, run on the mill, milquetoast Democrat.
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@basilfawlty89 run "of" the mill
oldguy73 · 70-79, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment