Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Was the Signal leak really an accident or was it done on purpose?

Are we truly in the hands of such incompetent leaders? I want to believe not, but I don't know anymore...

It makes me sad and disappointed to read the news nowadays...
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
What signal leak???
LiLShrimp · 22-25, F
@Musicman You should look it up. Short answer is politicians fcked up and accidentally leaked their private text messages about U.S. war plans.
@LiLShrimp When you make a post you need to clarify within the post, not just ASSume, then EXPECT the person to look it up themselves when they don't know.
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@NativePortlander1970 Thank you! 😊
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
@LiLShrimp Didn't they accidentally invite a journalist into that meeting?
LiLShrimp · 22-25, F
@Thevy29 Yeah they did, allegedly. But idk this whole thing doesn't smell right
LiLShrimp · 22-25, F
@NativePortlander1970 Please tone down your entitlement. I was already polite in my response to ask the gentleman to look it up himself. It is not my duty to inform you guys of what is already out there on the news. Read it yourself then form your own thoughts.
@LiLShrimp No, you made the claim, you provide the evidence, basic nettiquite that goes along with debate and lecturing/speech ettiquites.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@Musicman Signal is an encrypted communication app. It was used by Hegseth and others for a meeting. It's security is in question along with a reporter being invited. The actual story is much more complicated.
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@Gibbon Thank you very much 😊
LiLShrimp · 22-25, F
@NativePortlander1970 Now you're the one ASSuming. There is no claim, no debate, and frankly I'm too tired to even start one. This is me being tired of what I read and questioning its validity. Now why are you being difficult and entitled?
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@LiLShrimp I had to cheat to see who you replied to assuming. Out of a personal grudge I am suggesting you block that member. He and another member he worships are untrustworthy and trouble makers.
LiLShrimp · 22-25, F
@Gibbon Yeah I'm really considering it. Glad to know I'm not the only one feeling that way!
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@Gibbon Are you saying that I am untrustworthy and a trouble maker?
GerOttman · 61-69, M
@Musicman We were all thinking it actually...
WalksWith · 56-60, F
@NativePortlander1970

That's very rich for you to afford, man. Coming from someone who inexplicably refuses to show ANY CREDIBLE source for any of the lies you spread.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@Musicman Absolutely not talking about you. I thought it would be clear to Lilshrimp who I was talking about without saying his name. He is obviously being his obnoxious self in this post. I found a way to cheat and see who it was. You and I have discussed him before and why the forgetful SOB blocked me.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@GerOttman You are focused on the wrong member
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@LiLShrimp I hope you realize I'm not talking about @Musicman
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@Gibbon Thank you. I feel much better now. I always thought we were good. 🙂🙂🙂
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@Musicman I thought the way I worded my reply clearly pointed to who I was talking about it. I used a specific word she used in replying to him.
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@Gibbon Another user seemed to think you meant me. He wasn't to nice so I blocked him. 🤷‍♂
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@Musicman I replied to them and told them they were focusing on the wrong member.
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@Gibbon Thank you very much 😊 Should I unblock him?
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@Musicman Unless there was another I can't see.
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
@Gibbon Done!