Doj policy not to prosecute a sitting president. Preventing trump's prosecution is BS.

Trump is not currently a sitting president. For 2 weeks he can still be brought to trial and should be.
Current precedent to 'not indite a "sitting president" Is absolute bs. Mfer broke the law. Incited an insurrection specifically and loudly called for a government official to be killed and as such should be brought to justice.
Instead post retirement age overly corrupt "justices" paralyzed by unwritten policy that isnt applicable.
Sounds like senility to me!
What do you think? They put Clinton under oath.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

DogMan · 61-69, M

Democrats are terrified that Trump will use the DOJ like they used it. 10's of thousands of
people could be convicted of the non-serious crimes that Democrats leveled against Trump.

Everyone, including Democrats, know that there would have been Zero indictments against
him, if he had not run again in 2024.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@DogMan Breaking into a federal building like what happened on Jan 6th is a crime, if it was a bunch of leftists you wouldn't say that, you'd tell us that we were criminals and should be prosecuted.

jehova · 36-40, M

@SatanBurger actually i would say that. I did then and i would for anyone breaking into any building. Its clearly illlegal regardless the political leanings or dominant hand of who does it.

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@jehova But the person who you're responding to wouldn't. They believe they're "political prisoners."

jehova · 36-40, M

@SatanBurger correct ty

DogMan · 61-69, M

@SatanBurger Yes, some broke in, and many were let in. One of the persons that broke in, was shot to death.

DogMan · 61-69, M

@jehova What would have happened if the looters in 2020 had been shot and killed? Democrats would have hung
the business owners, because THEY allowed the looting and arson. But I know, lefties think that is completely different. 🙄

DogMan · 61-69, M

@jehova Yes I know Mr. Witness, There have been on going indictments against Trump since 2016. They have tried to
tie him up ever since. And as soon as he stopped helping them find a crime against him, he was indicted for obstruction.

jehova · 36-40, M

@DogMan ok and presidential immunity shouldnt apply. It didnt for clinton or Nixon. or Reagan? Im no witness what i see isnt in the text.