Top | Newest First | Oldest First
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
In 1962, speaking at the Economic Club of New York, Kennedy said he was committed to "an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes." The tax system, mostly designed during World War II, "exerts too heavy a drag on growth in peace time; that it siphons out of the private economy too large a share of personal and business purchasing power; that it reduces the financial incentives for personal effort, investment, and risk-taking," he said.
View 5 more replies »
JSul3 · 70-79
@sunsporter1649 Military Industrial Complex for starters.
I am sure your genius boy Musk will carve out the excess, right?
I am sure your genius boy Musk will carve out the excess, right?
JSul3 · 70-79
@trollslayer Oh...like tax loopholes?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
Reagan cut the tax rates and the nation has never recovered.
NatureGuy77 · 56-60, M
Tax rates were brought down in the early ‘80s by Reagan the economy took off by the mid 80’s. Here was Reagan’s re-election map in 1984. Is there a correlation here?
Northwest · M
@NatureGuy77 Trickle down economics. What precipitated America's slide into massive deficits, the dismantling of the middle class.
The actual booming of the American economy did not happen during the Reagan days, although some of the wealthy corporations and individuals got richer and fatter.
The actual second post WWII boom started during the Clinton days and had zero to do with trickle down economics. This was fueled by the Silicon Valley.
The actual booming of the American economy did not happen during the Reagan days, although some of the wealthy corporations and individuals got richer and fatter.
The actual second post WWII boom started during the Clinton days and had zero to do with trickle down economics. This was fueled by the Silicon Valley.
NatureGuy77 · 56-60, M
@Northwest Federal tax revenue did not fall gross or as a percent of GDP after marginal tax rates were lowered. The Laffer Curve was proven accurate. I might add Clinton governed to the center after the ‘94 mid terms flip Congress to Republicans for 3/4ths if his Presidency
Northwest · M
@NatureGuy77
Not true.
The Latter curve cannot be taken as an island. What's the context?
Only as far as social/unemployment programs were concerned. The Silicon Valley driven economic boom has nothing to do with Gingrich's Congress.
Federal tax revenue did not fall gross or as a percent of GDP after marginal tax rates were lowered.
Not true.
The Laffer Curve was proven accurate.
The Latter curve cannot be taken as an island. What's the context?
I might add Clinton governed to the center after the ‘94 mid terms flip Congress to Republicans for 3/4ths if his Presidency
Only as far as social/unemployment programs were concerned. The Silicon Valley driven economic boom has nothing to do with Gingrich's Congress.
thisguy20 · 41-45, M
A higher tax rate for the rich would definitely make the US better.
Need to go back to the 90% rate on capital gains
Need to go back to the 90% rate on capital gains
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
How the right take advantage of a yearning for social democracy and impose turbo-charged neoliberalism.
Northwest · M
The top tax rate was higher than that during Americas golden age, the post WWII era when we completely dominated the world.
At the time though, the middle class dominated and people could afford all the "goodies" that made us the envy of the world.
At the time though, the middle class dominated and people could afford all the "goodies" that made us the envy of the world.
Northwest · M
@trollslayer Let's see what he comes up with. I look forward to ending the wars in Europe and Middle East. To bringing manufacturing back to the USA. To the expansion of the Middle class as the largest segment of US demographics.
NatureGuy77 · 56-60, M
@Northwest The post WWII era was dominated not due to US tax rates but because European economies were in shambles due to their manufacturing base was destroyed by the war in Europe. US was able to fill that void until Europe recovered their economy and manufacturing capabilities
Northwest · M
@NatureGuy77
Huh? As if anyone suggested this is the case, or this assertion is anyhow shape or form somewhat connect to the topic at hand.
No shit 🤣 but you think this is somehow germane to the discussion?
I know, you forget to throw Japan in the mix.
The post WWII era was dominated not due to US tax rates
Huh? As if anyone suggested this is the case, or this assertion is anyhow shape or form somewhat connect to the topic at hand.
but because European economies were in shambles due to their manufacturing base was destroyed by the war in Europe. US was able to fill that void until Europe recovered their economy and manufacturing capabilities
No shit 🤣 but you think this is somehow germane to the discussion?
I know, you forget to throw Japan in the mix.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
Some say America was at its peak between 1950-1980. Then it just slowly but surely started going down the hill. 🤔
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@Zonuss economically yes. NAFTA accelerated the decline .
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Project 2025 includ s proposals to either reduce taxes on the wealthy and increase the tax burden on consumers.
jehova · 31-35, M
Thats a good observation in most of the world its 50% across the board.
Bumbles · 51-55, M
Trump raised my taxes once. I suppose he’ll do it again.
Elessar · 26-30, M
And in 2025 it'll be 0%