Why do you think tens of millions of Americans support a fascist candidate…

Poll - Total Votes: 24

They focus on the innocuous policies they favor and accept a calculated risk

They are truly receptive to the fascist core that Trumpism presents to them

Show Results

You can only vote on one answer.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ElwoodBlues · M

@Jake966 says

and if you want to know what Harris did in California has district attorney she tried eight cases.

Harris's accomplishments

Set a new record for the most tie-breaking Senate votes cast by a VP in history
Expanded the Child Tax Credit to cut child poverty in half
Provided $450 billion in relief to 6 million small businesses
Sponsored legislation to expand and strengthen Social Security
Led the push for the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights Act, federal worker unionization, and overtime pay for farm workers

Led the White House Blueprint for Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis
Created the first-ever federal health and safety requirements for maternal emergency services in hospitals
Extended postpartum Medicaid coverage from 2 to 12 months to provide lifesaving coverage in 46 states
Connected 38,000 people to free 24/7 support with the new National Maternal Mental Health Hotline
Shut down scam healthcare websites
Sued drug companies for unlawful drug pricing and marketing tactics
Allowed Medicare to negotiate lower drug costs, expected to save taxpayers $6 billion
Capped the cost of insulin to $35/month for seniors
Voted against Trump’s budget cuts to Medicare and Medicaid

Invested $370 billion to combat climate change and expand energy production

Won $20 billion settlement for homeowners during the foreclosure crisis
Took on for-profit colleges that scammed Americans
Took on big corporations that took advantage of working people
Introduced a student loan forgiveness program for mental health professionals
Won settlements from companies that underpaid workers and violated labor laws
Announced administration’s plans to remove medical debt from credit reports
Protected seniors from fraud and abuse

Oversees the first-ever White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention
Stopped nearly 30,000 firearms sales to convicted domestic abusers
Closed the gun show loophole to ensure sellers conduct background checks
Led the fight to pass a red flag law

Jake966 · 56-60, M

@ElwoodBlues is that besides withholding evidence to wrongfully convict a guy for something he didn’t do ?

ElwoodBlues · M

@Jake966 Details of the case, please??

Jake966 · 56-60, M

@ElwoodBlues

ElwoodBlues · M

@Jake966 Thanks! As your article points out, it was the SF PD who operated the lab, not the SF DA. Was anyone in the DA's office sanctioned for withholding evidence? Particularly anyone named Harris??

Let's hear what Harris has to say:

"No excuses," Harris told the Washington Post. "The buck stops with me."

When asked why she had not implemented a Brady policy across her six-year tenure in the office, Harris said she had worked to implement it for about two years but did not complete the guidelines over complications regarding police personnel information, according to the outlet.

"I cared a lot about working out a Brady policy. … I was saying in my office, we have to have one. It was a big controversy," she told WaPo. "We were working on this, and it was much too slow. It took too long."

Fox News Digital reached out to the campaign for additional comment on the matter.

Harris' office did implement a Brady policy following the scandal, which she said was subsequently lauded as "a model" for other district attorneys.

"It took too long to implement, but I am proud we implemented a Brady policy in the D.A.’s office that was later called ‘a model for other jurisdictions’" by the California Supreme Court, Harris said in a comment to the Wall Street Journal in 2019.

Harris owned it, took responsibility. Have you EVER heard Trump take responsibility for ANYTHING in this way???

Jake966 · 56-60, M

@ElwoodBlues in the article it states the DA’s office violated the defendants constitutional rights