This is making the rounds in the history section of twitter, didn't realize so many were following this and disgusted by it.
It shows Democratic talking points given to the media, and the link above the media following it exactly.
How are we supposed to operate as a Democracy without free media? Democrats already lost the right to vote in their primaries. Now they lack a free media.
I was forced to block a member here after it occured to me he never once told the truth about politics. He wasn't expressing opinions or his views, he was stating facts of what happened, and it never happened. And it was over and over again.
I suppose historians by default have a higher threshold for the truth. We don't accept lies because they are more convenient to our ideology. Well, there is a ideological subsection of history that does this, but it js usually quite easy to spot and dismiss them.
Historians, who "by default have a higher threshold for the truth", recently rated Trump 45th out of our 45 presidents. It is clear that he should never be elected by the Electoral College again given his abysmal performance the first time.
@windinhishair It is typical of me to debunk bad polls. I told the truth, you failed to debunk my claims. I can post images of the scientific polling, but I suspect you'll claim you or blind or illiterate.
I'm highly trained in debate, used to be a member of just about every philosophy group in San Francisco, debated professors from University of California, Davis and won, I'm not remotely confused and intimidated.
You know why I keep pointing out you were debunked? Alot of people passively view this site, don't make posts, but they read. They see the handful of Democrats here all respond in unison, and you are clearly lying right now. It makes you look really bad, and in doing this you strip votes from Biden. I don't have to worry about hurting Trump, because I hold to the truth, and systemmatically debunk you.
You will continue to look the fool, until the election, and then President Trump will be sworn back in. Kamala hasn't changed the dynamics of the race, she's still losing like Biden was. That's what really matters. And nobody will remember your broken poll that isn't reputable, and isn't taken seriously. It doesn't reflect polls by REAL historians. Find polls by real historians, preferably one that strives at being unbiased, systemmatic, explaining it's methodology and tries to account for and control the variables. That's the heart of polling science.
@Motzu How nice for you to need to toot your own horn. Ineffective, but sweet. I don’t have to boast about my accomplishments. I can stand on my own without adding false self-importance as you clearly need to.
I gave you a survey by historians and presidency experts that you tried to malign by calling them members of some golf association, right after saying that historians have a higher threshold for the truth. So you lied, because you don’t like their conclusions. And you lied that they had a left wing bias. The group included members of both major parties and independents. And the survey results are very similar to other past surveys. The same groups of presidents appear at the top, bottom, and mid range. There is nothing surprising about the results at all. There is a reason you didn’t cite previous surveys, because they show essentially the same results this one does. And you know it, but choose to lie by omission.
I highly doubt our exchange will cost Harris the election. Or even change a single vote. How typically pompous of you, the self-proclaimed master debater, to believe anyone really cares what either of us say.
Oh, and by the way, I’m not a Democrat and have been a registered independent since the late 1970s. Before that I was a registered Republican. I have voted for both Republicans and Democrats in every election up to 2018, so there is no need to lie again and lump me in with Democrats, though of course you will.
Republicans are more upset over how Harris was elevated than Democrats are. You can stop with the concern trolling. We all knew we were voting for the Biden-Harris ticket. But none of you voted for JD Vance. Trump should have announced his VP pick a year ago instead of hiding it.
@Vin53 He spearheaded the rescue of several hostages, worked to get Germany into paying their NATO dues, gave weapons to Ukraine (Biden put a stop to that), made peace with the middle east via the Abraham Accords, spearheaded Corona Virus Vaccine research and production (I have weak lungs, took every booster, thanks to Trump), got India involved in Maritime patrolling in the middle east (they are our biggest ally in the indian ocean and red sea fighting pirates right now), gave important tax relief, gave emergency checks to those without any money during the corona virus lockdowns, encouraged liberal governors to end their draconian lockdowns long after the rest of the country ended their lock downs, etc.
Thanks for sharing this document. I gotta say, I knew, long before this moment, that "czar" was a title invented by the media, and nothing official. It makes for shorter headlines; nothing more!
And I knew, long before this moment, that the person in charge of our borders is Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas! How did I know that? Because, back in April of this year, REPUBLICANS IMPEACHED HIM over his handling of the border!!
Do I need to supply you with links about the Mayorkas impeachment in the House? Or are you able to recall that yourself??
AND, are you able to follow the ineluctable logic? The logic that says if republicans identified and impeached Mayorkas for being in charge of the border three months ago, then they absofvckinlutely KNEW Harris wasn't in charge of the border. Can you follow that logic??
Which brings me to what's MISSING from your critique of that document. What's MISSING is where it's true or not!! Whether it's independently VERIFIABLE or not!!
For example, are there news stories from a couple years ago mentioning Harris looking into ROOT CAUSES of families attempting to migrate? Are there news stories from a couple years ago mentioning Harris pursuing diplomatic ties with the “Northern Triangle” Latin American nations??
Because, if the contents of the document are TRUE and INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE, if they are FACTUAL, then why do you have such a problem with news reports including those facts??
