This is making the rounds in the history section of twitter, didn't realize so many were following this and disgusted by it.
It shows Democratic talking points given to the media, and the link above the media following it exactly.
How are we supposed to operate as a Democracy without free media? Democrats already lost the right to vote in their primaries. Now they lack a free media.
I was forced to block a member here after it occured to me he never once told the truth about politics. He wasn't expressing opinions or his views, he was stating facts of what happened, and it never happened. And it was over and over again.
I suppose historians by default have a higher threshold for the truth. We don't accept lies because they are more convenient to our ideology. Well, there is a ideological subsection of history that does this, but it js usually quite easy to spot and dismiss them.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Thanks for sharing this document. I gotta say, I knew, long before this moment, that "czar" was a title invented by the media, and nothing official. It makes for shorter headlines; nothing more!
And I knew, long before this moment, that the person in charge of our borders is Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas! How did I know that? Because, back in April of this year, REPUBLICANS IMPEACHED HIM over his handling of the border!!
Do I need to supply you with links about the Mayorkas impeachment in the House? Or are you able to recall that yourself??
AND, are you able to follow the ineluctable logic? The logic that says if republicans identified and impeached Mayorkas for being in charge of the border three months ago, then they absofvckinlutely KNEW Harris wasn't in charge of the border. Can you follow that logic??
Which brings me to what's MISSING from your critique of that document. What's MISSING is where it's true or not!! Whether it's independently VERIFIABLE or not!!
For example, are there news stories from a couple years ago mentioning Harris looking into ROOT CAUSES of families attempting to migrate? Are there news stories from a couple years ago mentioning Harris pursuing diplomatic ties with the “Northern Triangle” Latin American nations??
Because, if the contents of the document are TRUE and INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE, if they are FACTUAL, then why do you have such a problem with news reports including those facts??
