Oral Argument on the Constitutionality of the Special Counsel Jack Smith

On June 21, Judge Cannon will hold oral argument on the Appointments Clause challenge to Special Counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of Donald Trump. The Court granted leave for three amici to argue.

The parties will argue on President Trump’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on the unlawful appointment of the special counsel. As the judge previously indicated, amici including experts who advanced this legal theory will be allowed to participate in the hearing.

The judge’s announcement of the hearing some weeks ago coincided with her decision to indefinitely postpone the classified documents case against the former president.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP

everything the dems do is
A, unconstitutional
B. illegal.
the problem is. they pass its and its months or years later before its deemed so and overturned by the courts.
meanwhile the damage done in between in limbo..

they should be strung up.

wash rinse, repeat..

BigGuy2 · 26-30, M

It speaks volumes at the quality of the Lawyers doesn't it, if they have no shame in doing this, but i'm guessing corrupt people have no shame, just like cheaters:

"It's only breaking the Law if you get caught"

"I'm only cheating if i get caught"

JimBeam · M

They have to dismiss the classified documents case, or they're going to explain why Biden isn't being prosecuted.

Add a comment...