Trump's Hush-Money Trial - Why are you watching this 'CRAP'

Trump - the man:
He openly admits that he uses women and that he thinks assaulting them by grabbing them by their crotches is an OK thing to do and that the woman enjoys it. What does that tell you about his sense of propriety and respect for himself and others?
He has had to defend himself from several charges of sexual assault. What does that tell you about his self-control AND what does it tell you about his ability to learn from experience?
He had a months long open sexual affair with a young woman despite having just previously married a beautiful woman. What does that say about his integrity?
He used a prostitute for his sexual gratification - What does that tell you about his morals?
He tried to hide that encounter by paying her EXTRA money for silence so it would not influence his bid as YOUR President AND then - claimed it as an election cost in his income tax claim. That's criminal.

NOW: He's openly trying to gain publicity by trying to convince the court of YOUR country that other people are defaming him and that he is innocent of having committed a fraud!

Why is he doing all of this?: It's to 'clear' his name so he may convince you to vote for him "AGAIN"

[b]Would you even support your own child if they acted this way? [/b] SO: What do you hope to gain from watching this sordid man continue to abuse the courts, the jurors, the witnesses and your common sense?

missyann · 56-60

It seems kind of funny to me that the majority of these came out after he was president. Not condoning that kind of behavior but I’m pretty sure that Democrats are looking for these women like they did the woman who went after Brett Kavanaugh . That was the Democrats. She said more than once that she couldn’t remember details. So why would she go after him on her own?

I wonder if they went back to his first grade class and half all the women if he lifted their dresses? That would be sexual assault.

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@MarmeeMarch The key words in your statement are "born to be". Don't get me wrong: I am not a person who believes that embryos are not a sacred trust - a woman bearing an embryo has a responsiblity to give it every chance for proper development (no drugs, no tobacco, no stress, no x-rays, as much as is reasonably possible) but when the embryo was planted in her she should have had a choice then and if not, then she should have a choice not to carry it to birth. This points directly to the cases where a man (husband, partner, father, step-father, stranger, pimp, son, nephew, uncle, etc.) imposes himself on her at a time when she's fertile then she should have a choice. Your Supreme Court has taken that choice away from her. Which human has the right to dictate that decision to any othe human any more than a woman deciding for herself not to bear the future child? We all live our own lives in a democratic world??

missyann · 56-60

@JollyRoger Science confirms that when the egg and sperm fuse a new distinct human life comes into existence. This human life has a DNA that has never been or will ever be again. Even pro abortion scientists says that this is when a human life begins. The argument isn’t whether it’s a human life it’s Whether this human life is a person. Pro life says that they definitely are..

Is a baby conceived in rape or incest any less human than a baby conceived in love? Do you believe these babies are somehow marked to say that they were conceived in rape? Are they born with horns? If you put two newborns side-by-side, could you tell by just looking at them, which one was conceived in rape? These human lives have nothing to do with their conception. They did not give their consent.. why should their completely innocent lives be intentionally and deliberately ended , (killed ). In the United States, in what other circumstance do we give children the death penalty for the crimes of their fathers? Instead of rallying for the right to kill the baby, why aren’t we rallying together, pro life and pro abortion to make raping, a woman, or a child a crime that warrants the death penalty. I believe that it should be the same method that would be used to abort the second innocent victim of their crime or be surgically castrated, and put in a high security woman’s prison for life. If we start convicting these despicable men with harsher punishments that resemble their crimes I’ll bet that there would be less.

Every citizen in this country has the right and the responsibility to vote for or against issues that we believe affect society. I also believe that it is wrong for someone to physically or sexually abuse a child. Should I not be able to speak out against that? I believe it is wrong for anyone to hold a slave.. would it be wrong for me to vote for a law that says anyone who holds a slave will get prison time?

If we are going to make it legal for a woman exclusively to end the most innocent of human lives, why shouldn’t it be legal for anyone to kill innocent lives? What’s the difference?