Trump's Hush-Money Trial - Why are you watching this 'CRAP'

Trump - the man:
He openly admits that he uses women and that he thinks assaulting them by grabbing them by their crotches is an OK thing to do and that the woman enjoys it. What does that tell you about his sense of propriety and respect for himself and others?
He has had to defend himself from several charges of sexual assault. What does that tell you about his self-control AND what does it tell you about his ability to learn from experience?
He had a months long open sexual affair with a young woman despite having just previously married a beautiful woman. What does that say about his integrity?
He used a prostitute for his sexual gratification - What does that tell you about his morals?
He tried to hide that encounter by paying her EXTRA money for silence so it would not influence his bid as YOUR President AND then - claimed it as an election cost in his income tax claim. That's criminal.

NOW: He's openly trying to gain publicity by trying to convince the court of YOUR country that other people are defaming him and that he is innocent of having committed a fraud!

Why is he doing all of this?: It's to 'clear' his name so he may convince you to vote for him "AGAIN"

[b]Would you even support your own child if they acted this way? [/b] SO: What do you hope to gain from watching this sordid man continue to abuse the courts, the jurors, the witnesses and your common sense?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

missyann · 56-60

It seems kind of funny to me that the majority of these came out after he was president. Not condoning that kind of behavior but I’m pretty sure that Democrats are looking for these women like they did the woman who went after Brett Kavanaugh . That was the Democrats. She said more than once that she couldn’t remember details. So why would she go after him on her own?

I wonder if they went back to his first grade class and half all the women if he lifted their dresses? That would be sexual assault.

Theyitis · 36-40, M

@missyann [quote]It seems kind of funny to me that the majority of these came out after he was president.[/quote] The majority of what, exactly? The majority of sexual assault cases? No, he had I think 24 of them in 2016, and, with Russia’s help, he still got elected president anyway.

The Stormy Daniels hush money case was only illegal because he wrote it off as merely a legal expense, when in fact it should have been written off as a campaign expense because he paid the hush money so she wouldn’t go public with their affair, which would have potentially ruined his chances of getting elected president. So of course it came out after he was president, because he used illegal means to help himself get elected president, that [i]was[/i] the crime.

missyann · 56-60

@Theyitis We’re gonna have to go way back in politics if we’re going to be fair. We don’t have enough jail space for all the crimes that our politicians have committed.. including Biden who has paid has money

Theyitis · 36-40, M

@missyann You’ve got proof Biden committed a crime? Well what are you waiting for? Rush it to the House Republicans in DC, they’ve been searching for it for at least the last year and a half!

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

missyann · 56-60

@Theyitis Oh it’s there. Conservatives know how to buy their time and wait for the perfect moment. I can see this coming out right before the election. The evidence will be there, but no time to lie. Oops., BUSTED.

I don’t wish any thing. Bad on anyone, but Biden’s cannot reverse his dementia. It is only getting worse. And I don’t think anyone feels comfortable with kamala being president.

Theyitis · 36-40, M

@missyann [quote]Conservatives know how to buy their time and wait for the perfect moment [/quote]…And apparently waste time [i]not[/i] presenting their best evidence at impeachment hearings instead of solving problems like the “crisis” at the southern border.

missyann · 56-60

@Theyitis Wow, the pot calling the kettle black. Democrats have wasted four years trying to have Trump arrested indicted and put in jail while they had the White House and could make a real difference.

They are so afraid that Trump will be elected. But hey, didn’t we hear the 2020 election that the people made their choice and. “ The election wasn’t stolen.”

Theyitis · 36-40, M

@missyann Whataboutism. Besides, Democratic [i]legislators[/i] have not wasted tax payer money on witch hunts, presenting evidence that goes nowhere instead of legislating, Democratic [i]prosecutors [/i]have taken the appropriate steps to hold Trump accountable for his crimes, which is what prosecutors are paid to do. These things take time, but they may yet lead to one or more convictions.

missyann · 56-60

@Theyitis I suppose anything can happen. But if he is found guilty, I guarantee you guarantee you that conservatives are going to go back and charge former liberal presidents with crimes, because we all know they committed crimes. No they’re not running for office, but they will go through the humiliation and financial hell.

No former president has ever been charged with their crimes. Libs were doing this before they even knew positively that he was going to run.

Even if Democrats win in November, I am telling you this is going to come back and bite them in the ass. Not only Biden but crimes of senators, congressmen and representatives. We all know that there have been financial and sex crimes in some of their states.

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@missyann Gee Missy.... You don't think he did these things? The evidence is already there! So, he's 'guilty' but playing the role of "I am above the law because I WAS the POTUS and I am immune of all wrong-doing." Let the turkey go back to running his own businesses and keep his hands off the public purse. Go ahead... prosecute all previous Presidents.... they deserve it too! And so do all 'next' Presidents to come = It may make your country a better place!

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@MarmeeMarch Oh... you missed it? Russia helped by hacking into Hillary's computer and exposing what she was holding as US documents.... that was leaked to the Trump group just before the election and that affected some people's opinions of her. I'm not saying that she was the better candidate; I'm saying that Russia obviously had an interest in seeing Donald as President simply because he can be easily manipulated, is open to being blackmailed (see the trial evidence?) and speaks without thinking about American interests as a whole. In short: He's a dangerous person to hold the reins of power - but is useful to have in power in a country like the USA because he discredits your whole country in the eyes of the world and thus Russia can gain from that weakness. (Does that make sense?)
I forgot to add: And he has PROVED himself to be just what Russia thinks he is!

This message was deleted by its author.

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@MarmeeMarch Ah yes.... but even Canada has a gripe against foreign 'election tampering' hackers. We currently are considering sanctions against both China and India for incidents that are KNOWN to be true (denied of course by the countries blamed). If Canada can have it happen - don't you think the USA would be a target too? And you do know that we are a member of "5 EYES" that does our own snooping and counter-snooping?

This message was deleted by its author.

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@MarmeeMarch Excuse me for snickering! Can your Constitutio be 'airtight' when the the Justices can be swayed from reading its prior rulings by the person who appoints them! Then:: Where in the Constitution is abortion mentioned as an offense against a woman who seeks it? Yet!! Then it says all men are equal under God.... Yet is your "Lady Justice" blind as to who gets set free and who doesn't under the same statutes for the same felonies?

Now to answer your question about 'tampering" = that simply means that someone tries to influence the outcome of an election by putting out lies and influencing people's thoughts. When a foreign country operates to influence the outcomes of your government by spreading lies or even (as in Hillary's case truths)... that's tampering. ... that happens a LOT in your country and I'm also talking about the stupidity of things like "Democrats eat babies" = yet that sort of crap gets repeated widely on the internet and people are swayed (I don't knon how they can be so gullible) into believing it!

No.. I'm not barking at you... I'm just pointing out how 'tampering' gets done and how the American people are being led around to believe the falsehoods that appear just before election day.
Here (in Canada - and I'm not bragging), we can get rid of our Prime Minister and his governing party at any time during their time in office.... all it takes is a valid 'vote of non-confidence' in our Parliament and 'poof' we'll have another election. It's costly, but it's worth it. Our PM isn't elected separately.... he/she is simply the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons (House of Reps to you). If their party wishes to switch in someone else as PM ,.... It's done and onto the bench he/she goes! We don't vote by computer either.... we sort of enjoy getting out to see our neighbours serving as scruitineers and balloteers.... but we're open to the idea. We use it in smaller elections - as you say....just like banking.

This message was deleted by its author.

missyann · 56-60

@MarmeeMarch so correct . Every human being who has ever walked the face of the Earth was created the exact same way. They were conceived.. if they consider themselves to be a human being with the right to l life today then they were a human being with the right to life the moment they were conceived.

The constitution does not say men who are born or men when they are viable outside, the womb are created equal.

there may be one, but I personally have never found a pro abortion argument that cannot be successfully disputed. No matter how much they try to dissect the constitution, the Bible and medical technology their arguments don’t work.

I agree 100% also with your response to the tampering. I guess Democrats are the only ones who are capable of making their own decisions about who they want to vote for.. i’m beginning to wonder if they’re capable of anything

This message was deleted by its author.

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@MarmeeMarch The key words in your statement are "born to be". Don't get me wrong: I am not a person who believes that embryos are not a sacred trust - a woman bearing an embryo has a responsiblity to give it every chance for proper development (no drugs, no tobacco, no stress, no x-rays, as much as is reasonably possible) but when the embryo was planted in her she should have had a choice then and if not, then she should have a choice not to carry it to birth. This points directly to the cases where a man (husband, partner, father, step-father, stranger, pimp, son, nephew, uncle, etc.) imposes himself on her at a time when she's fertile then she should have a choice. Your Supreme Court has taken that choice away from her. Which human has the right to dictate that decision to any othe human any more than a woman deciding for herself not to bear the future child? We all live our own lives in a democratic world??

missyann · 56-60

@JollyRoger Science confirms that when the egg and sperm fuse a new distinct human life comes into existence. This human life has a DNA that has never been or will ever be again. Even pro abortion scientists says that this is when a human life begins. The argument isn’t whether it’s a human life it’s Whether this human life is a person. Pro life says that they definitely are..

Is a baby conceived in rape or incest any less human than a baby conceived in love? Do you believe these babies are somehow marked to say that they were conceived in rape? Are they born with horns? If you put two newborns side-by-side, could you tell by just looking at them, which one was conceived in rape? These human lives have nothing to do with their conception. They did not give their consent.. why should their completely innocent lives be intentionally and deliberately ended , (killed ). In the United States, in what other circumstance do we give children the death penalty for the crimes of their fathers? Instead of rallying for the right to kill the baby, why aren’t we rallying together, pro life and pro abortion to make raping, a woman, or a child a crime that warrants the death penalty. I believe that it should be the same method that would be used to abort the second innocent victim of their crime or be surgically castrated, and put in a high security woman’s prison for life. If we start convicting these despicable men with harsher punishments that resemble their crimes I’ll bet that there would be less.

Every citizen in this country has the right and the responsibility to vote for or against issues that we believe affect society. I also believe that it is wrong for someone to physically or sexually abuse a child. Should I not be able to speak out against that? I believe it is wrong for anyone to hold a slave.. would it be wrong for me to vote for a law that says anyone who holds a slave will get prison time?

If we are going to make it legal for a woman exclusively to end the most innocent of human lives, why shouldn’t it be legal for anyone to kill innocent lives? What’s the difference?

JollyRoger · 70-79, M

@missyann Argue it anyway you like..... the bottom line is: A woman should have the right to control her own body.... she knows whether or not she can raise that potential child to be a good citizen or whether he/she will just be another abused soul in our society. You and I both know (be honest), that the rich women who get pregnant and don't want that child will still get abortions.... so why are we belaboring some poor woman who can't fend for herself from doing the same thing? Is it morality at you're worried about? Is it even a thought in your head whether your neighbour's daughter has an abortion or not? Put yourself in the position (assuming I'm writing to a woman here) of being pregnant with nobody to support you, with perhaps 3 or 4 other children to tend to, with having to work 2, maybe 3 jobs to put food on the table and now you've got that much more responsibility??? How did you get pregnant? Was it your choice or not?