Should any person be rich and powerful enough to be above the law?

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Ahh bless! Is the little diddums having a temper tantrum because he wants the last word – and I’m using his own words to take pot-shots at his over-inflated belief in his intellectual superiority?

@OliRos , @sarabee1995 , hey girls - I've learned something new today
[quote]JFK being shot in the head from a trial[/quote] Funny that! I remember, as a 10-year-old, seeing the TV news when JFK died, and they reported he was shot from a grassy knoll. Nobody suggested that it came from a trial (Criminal, Civil or otherwise) 🤣

@HootyTheNightOwl That sums it up.

@Burnley123 I'm thinking that this guy is the US equivalent of North Korea's Rocket man... Eternal president or something...

@Burnley123 @basilfawlty89 But........

@BritishFailedAesthetic Oh look, hes got worshippers in the royal family.

@Adrift What?????

Oh wait if that's a joke about Brit teeth, I'll give you that, it's pretty funny.

@Reason10 Coming from the side that thinks their cult leader Donny Dum Dum is a monarch and above the law and that the only people who should be held responsible for anything are Democrats.....because feelings.


And nobody should take a clown like you seriously who believes everything they read on the internet.

And I am sorry the American education system failed you and you don't know how your elections work.


Oh and a substance found in a building that is open to public tours no less doesn't magically mean the culprit is whoever your feelings tell you it is.

That is not how the legal system works.

The legal system is not based on vibe checks.

@Reason10 Here's why it's the WHITE house, duh

If it was about weed it would've been green

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I totally agree. Also, the law needs equal application.

@Elessar

https://youtu.be/b7o4ZQ4v7pg?feature=shared

@bookerdana

@Elessar Thats the USA

@OliRos that has nothing to do with what you're implying from the question

@Burnley123 I answered @sarabee1995's question, under her question.

@Picklebobble2 raised the matter of the interpretation of the law. I simply pointed out that the law of Sovereign Immunity, which defines the Monarch's status as above the law - the substance of your original question - was beyond interpretation.

Do try and pay attention.