Should any person be rich and powerful enough to be above the law?
41-45, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Interpretation of the law is the problem.
And then who has the right to even bring a case let alone attempt to prosecute it.
And then who has the right to even bring a case let alone attempt to prosecute it.
OliRos · 18-21, F
@Picklebobble2 There is no "interpretation". Sovereign Immunity protects the Monarch from prosecution, civil or criminal.
OliRos · 18-21, F
@Picklebobble2 1. The question as asked is, should any person be rich and powerful enough to be above the law?
The Monarch is a person, rich and powerful, and, thanks to Sovereign Immunity, above the law.
2. If you are really questioning the existence of Sovereign Immunity, you need to brush up on your sources of information.
The Monarch is a person, rich and powerful, and, thanks to Sovereign Immunity, above the law.
2. If you are really questioning the existence of Sovereign Immunity, you need to brush up on your sources of information.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
OliRos · 18-21, F
@Burnley123 I answered @sarabee1995's question, under her question.
@Picklebobble2 raised the matter of the interpretation of the law. I simply pointed out that the law of Sovereign Immunity, which defines the Monarch's status as above the law - the substance of your original question - was beyond interpretation.
Do try and pay attention.
@Picklebobble2 raised the matter of the interpretation of the law. I simply pointed out that the law of Sovereign Immunity, which defines the Monarch's status as above the law - the substance of your original question - was beyond interpretation.
Do try and pay attention.
