This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultUpdate
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Biden Accuser Tara Reade Sues DOJ, Seeks Millions in Damages Following Alleged ‘FBI Operation’ Against Her

"Tara Reade, the woman who came forward in 2020 with a sexual assault allegation against then-candidate Joe Biden, is suing the Department of Justice over alleged misconduct.

A lawyer for Reade filed a tort claim on Wednesday seeking $10 million “for infliction of emotional distress and anxiety” following what was described as an “FBI operation” that was conducted after she came forward with her accusation against Biden. The tort claim alleges Reade’s Fourth Amendment right was violated as well as violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and state privacy laws.

Included in the tort claim was a July 2020 grand jury subpoena issued to Twitter from the US District Court for the Eastern District of California demanding all records pertaining to Reade’s Twitter accounts.

The tort claim outlines several allegations against the FBI, insisting it was behind suspicious occurrences like disruptions in her bank accounts and a manuscript of her book that had gone missing from a FedEx shipment in November 2020 that further detailed her claims against Biden.

“The United States should not have a two-tiered justice system,” Reade’s attorney Jonathan Levy said in a statement.

“If President Trump and Mr. Giuliani can be assessed tens of millions in damages for their words; a weaponized FBI that seeks to silence, intimidate and eliminate Joe Biden’s victim, Tara Reade, must also be held accountable; failing to do so means our justice and legal system has become an instrument of political oppression and suppression.”
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
novaguy2u · 70-79, M
It does sound as though her credibility could be in question. I wouldn't want to be cross examined were I her.
This message was deleted by its author.
novaguy2u · 70-79, M
@MarmeeMarch I didn't say that. What I said, in effect, was that based on her history her credibility might be in question. I guess that she will get the opportunity to put it to the test.
This message was deleted by its author.
novaguy2u · 70-79, M
@MarmeeMarch Instead of hypothetical situations answer this: why are so few rapes and sexual assaults reported, and even less successfully prosecuted?
This message was deleted by its author.
novaguy2u · 70-79, M
@MarmeeMarch They are merely repeating what she told them. That would be described in a court of law as hearsay evidence.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@novaguy2u Yes, we know, only demonocrat women like blasey ford are to be believed....
novaguy2u · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 If you scroll back, you will find that at no point have I questioned her claims. I merely stated that with her background of lying, her credibility has to be in question. If she gets on the stand, and she must, defense counsel will take her background apart in great detail, exposing any lies and highlighting them in an effort to destroy her credibility. I'm afraid that it is standard practice, Defense 101.