sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
Yup. The obvious and inherent right to self defense is enshrined in both the US federal and the Oregon state constitutions as a right to keep and bear arms.
Both constitutions contain mechanisms to enact changes. Basic laws passed by simply majorities, especially ones like this that passed by very small margins, should not overturn what was originally put in place by super majorities.
The Constitution protects against the tyranny of the majority.
Both constitutions contain mechanisms to enact changes. Basic laws passed by simply majorities, especially ones like this that passed by very small margins, should not overturn what was originally put in place by super majorities.
The Constitution protects against the tyranny of the majority.
View 24 more replies »
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
@LordShadowfire Or with equal doses of sarcasm. I'm good with that as well ... sometimes prefer it. On here I've made a huge effort to eliminate sarcasm because most people just don't get it. But I love the genre of humor and use it in debate all the time to great effect in real life. In the written word it's just ... more challenging.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, MVIP
@sarabee1995 Well, good. Then we can agree that sarcasm ≠ hate. I'm glad we cleared this up.
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
@LordShadowfire Hate??? Oh my gosh no! Never.
Ynotisay · M
MethDozer · M
Judges and politicians aren't at the mercy of the will of the people. They are at the mercy of the law and what is written forth. Part of democracy is the will of the populous is bound by the constraints of the law and Constitution until they have it changed.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, MVIP
@MethDozer Yeah, well, we voted to change the law in Oregon, and we were told to fuck ourselves.
MethDozer · M
@LordShadowfire It violated the State Constitution from what I read. You have to change that for a law to be implemented.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, MVIP
@MethDozer Ugh... guess we'll have to amend the Constitution first.