Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

GOP impeachment inquiry

Sounds like this inquiry revolves around them still being butthurt because Trump was twice impeached, and that Biden won the election. They are so butthurt that this is their top priority, even above funding the government.

To highlight the differences: The Trump impeachments began with events that occurred, the first being a phone call with Ukraine that a whistleblower filed a report on, the second being the Jan 6th events. The Biden inquiry is more along the lines of "Hunter Biden is a shady drug user who somehow held high positions - Joe Biden must be a crook, let's look for evidence." The first are examples of witnessing an event and deciding whether it is worthy of impeachment. The second is an example of having a feeling "something isn't right" and then continuing to pry hoping to find something. The first is NOT a "witch hunt", the second is a "Witch hunt". Even the GOP's witnesses say there is only circumstantial evidence at best.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Article 2 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law

The president must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the Constitution imposes a duty on the president to enforce the laws of the United States and is called the Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause or Faithfully Executed Clause. This clause is meant to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the president even if he disagrees with the purpose of that law.

8 U.S. Code Chapter 12 - IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 Oh you did NOT just that clause in Bidens case. I must be seeing things..,..😷
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman Your glass belt buckle is fogged over again