Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Budweiser Gets Humiliated at Sturgis Motorcycle Rally

"The boycott against Bud Light over its partnership with transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney this spring is showing no signs of stopping, with beer distributors acknowledging that consumers have likely left the brand for good “and that’s how it’s going to be.”

If the recent Sturgis Motorcycle Rally is any indication, that distributor is right.

During the 10-day event, in which hundreds of thousands of bikers head to the South Dakota city each year to ride, enjoy parties and concerts, and sightsee, the Budweiser beer garage was dead.

Multiple videos posted on social media from different days showed the same empty spot, despite how jam packed the surrounding areas were. "

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

Yes, yes, we understand. You stand against equality in all its forms.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne I seriously suggest you avoid Sturgis

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 Why, are they against equality as well?

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne I even more strongly suggest you avoid Sturgis

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 I avoid any location where the people are against equal rights for everyone.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne Then you better avoid the formerly Constitutional Republic of the United States

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 I prefer to remove those who, like you, hate the idea of equal rights and representation.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne Then you better get busy and remove the members of the demonocrat party

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 They are not the ones who stand against equality. You have repeatedly demonstrated that you despise equal rights and equal representation.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne 'Splain to us why stacy abrams is waltzing around attempting to overturn an election?

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 You appear to have misspelled Donald Trump once again.

Tetsuya · 56-60, M

@CorvusBlackthorne

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@Tetsuya I know. Persons who support the insurrectionist Donald Trump should not talk of overturning elections.

Tetsuya · 56-60, M

@CorvusBlackthorne both sides are guilty of it

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@Tetsuya You lie, sir. The Democratic Party has not threatened judges, hired fake electors, or incited a crowd of people to terrorize the government employees who were counting the democratically gathered votes.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne "“I want to tell you, Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch, you have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price,” Schumer said as the judges hear opening arguments on the case Wednesday. “You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Tetsuya · 56-60, M

oh the irony

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 And you legitimately think that was a threat of violence? Are you so utterly incapable of comprehending non-violent tactics that you assume everyone around you is going to be violent? That speaks volumes to your own character.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne You're kidding, right?

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 I do not joke about such things. Threatening consequences for poor decisions does not necessarily require a threat of violence. If you are incapable of thinking of anything but violence, I do not think you should be wandering the streets unsupervised.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne Yes, we know, threatening Supreme Court Justices is protected speech for demonocrats. It's in The Constitution....somewhere

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 I will say it again. You appear to be completely unable to comprehend the difference between a threat of legal consequences and a threat of physical violence. Most likely, you have never threatened anyone with anything but violence in your life.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne Yes, we know, threatening Supreme Court Justices is protected speech for demonocrats. It's in The Constitution....somewhere.

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

The @sunsporter1649 bot is frozen again.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@CorvusBlackthorne “I want to tell you, President Biden and Attorney General Garland, you have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price,” President Trump said as the judges hear opening arguments on the case Wednesday. “You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@sunsporter1649 I understand that your brain is so addled from dementia that you cannot comprehend any interpretation of that statement that does not involve physical violence.