SCOTUS strikes down the Biden student loan handout.

@ron122 Jesus. You fucking simpletons can't imagine anybody doing anything out of the goodness of their heart, can you? Keep projecting what you would do.

@LordShadowfire Pretty much. This doofus has told on himself often on SW.

@LordShadowfire Give these people 10 to 20 years to realize how fucked they are in a country that will be depleted of doctors, among other high specialized workers.

@LordShadowfire If Biden were doing this out of the goodness of his heart, he would be using his [u]own[/u] money. 😏

@irishmolly72

@irishmolly72 Like this?

@MarmeeMarch Open a dictionary marmee, maybe even a Russian one if you understand it better at this point, and search the meaning of "bailout' and "borrow"

@MarmeeMarch Farmers taking out a bailout is fine, as is the administration deciding to concede a bailout. So it's only a problem because students aren't generally red voters?

Exactly what I meant to highlight here. Thank you for proving my point, marmee

@MarmeeMarch Do you? Because you're fine with farmers taking bailouts from taxpayers money, but not with students. If the thing that makes it a problem for you is that it's a loan, even better, cancel loans and bailouts the students exactly like farmers and corporations were under Trump.

Oh no, I'll keep saying out loud what you (plural) vote for so long as that vote is the relevant cause of this outrage. Like it or not, this ain't that cesspool of Russia, I have a right to freedom of speech buddy, especially when it comes to exposing partisanship and moral corruption.

@MarmeeMarch Ah because doctors are unnecessary instead? Engineers? Ever wondered where the machines used for agriculture comes out from? 🤦‍♂️

@MarmeeMarch And when your IQ will reach the incredible threshold of 2, you'll find out where those professionals are formed

@MarmeeMarch The taxpayers dude, the same taxpayers who get milked by rightoids to bailout for-profit corporations because they don't want to lose the privilege of sitting on the chair that some executive paid out.

Do you think a taxpayers would prefer to fund a teacher, who'll give them back a service by forming professionals that they'll need? Or do you think a taxpayer would prefer to fund some oil executive that'll spend their bailout in Champagne and hookers?

But from a guy who supports Russia's genocide, what can you even expect.

@MarmeeMarch Literally in the whole first-world a part of taxes cover a significant amount of education costs, including yes college level education. This because if not enough people can afford specializing, the economy gets heavily f*cked with a shortage of specialized workers.

On the other hand, bailing out rich CEOs for them to spend it in yatches and partying has zero return whatsoever to the taxpayers, and ultimately is a waste of public money.

As I told you, this ain't Russia, I have free speech. I'll continue to point out how you're in favor or wasting public money in bailouts that give absolutely zero returns to the taxpayers, while opposing economic reliefs to students that are critical for the system. In other words, you're here advocating for the US to go down the Russian brain drain path, because like the other Republicans on here, you're full of sh*t and actually care zero about tax money, only "owning the libs". And you know already when you can put that flag. NATO will continue to back Ukraine, deal with it, and cope.

@luckranger71 You people get your feelings hurt so easy.🤣

[quote]You people get your feelings hurt so easy[/quote] - Cletus, almost 24 hours later, 😂