Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Coming, in just over a year, to YOU...

[b]"One Health", from the World Health Organisation. Sounds like the Final Solution to all our woes!

And it might be just that!

So, no worries! Ignore this post, and go on enjoying your new post-covid freedom![/b]

This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
SW-User
[quote]WHO is integrating One Health across its units and offices, providing strategic advice relating to policy, and conducting training at the local, national and regional levels. The goal is [b]stronger programmes that are led and owned by countries[/b].[/quote]馃槾
WalterF70-79, M
@SW-User Let's reconvene on this in a year's time
SW-User
@WalterF won't we all have starved to death by then? You seem to think they'll take all our food.
WalterF70-79, M
@SW-User May 2024 is the date when the WHO starts to turn the screw. You'll be ok, of course, as you comply in every way. Those of us who don't won't have it so easy. There's a big price to pay for standing up to the lies.
SW-User
@WalterF What lies? What screw are they turning? And do not fob me off by telling me to look it up for myself: tell me.
WalterF70-79, M
@SW-User Here鈥檚 a sample showing one aspect of their power grab - taking unilateral highly questionable moral decisions and expecting all nations to submit

SW-User
@WalterF I have done a word search of the exhaustive WHO guidance on abortion, and nowhere does it say, or even allude in any way shape or form, to babies being "killed up until the moment they emerge from the birth canal, without delay, whenever a pregnant woman requests it."

This is made up. Plus, Brownstone is not exactly known for its fair and balanced, or even accurate reporting.

I label this article FALSE.
WalterF70-79, M
@SW-User Well of course you do! I didn鈥檛 expect anything else from one of the most zealous followers of the self-styled "fact-checkers" (who are in reality, as Zuckerberg was shamefacedly obliged to avow, nothing more than highly-paid opinion-givers).

Balanced reporting? Fair reporting? You don't get that anywhere now! What YOU consider as "fair and balanced" is the unilateral laying down of THE OFFICIAL STORYLINE, with all other opinions blocked and cancelled! You are in so much intellectual danger! Yet you cannot see it.

That, by the way, was just an intro on the WHO, led by that unshaven communist who can't manage to tighten the knot of his tie. More to follow.
SW-User
@WalterF I have read the article. They have cobbled together a bunch of phrases... sometimes paragraphs apart... (you can tell by the ellipses) and then have essentially decided it means babies can be killed at anytime.

Utter bullshit. Total and utter bullshit.
SW-User
@WalterF And by the way, I'm not relying on Facebook fact-checkers馃ぃI know full well they do as they're told馃ぃ
This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.