The World Health Organisation Monster is Tightening its Grip

@PhoenixPhail See my next post, H. Beyond nightmare.

@PhoenixPhail This one, yes. The WHO, which is a UN branch, is trying to learn and act upon lessons learnt from it in time for the next - which will happen one day - but it seems they are damned if they do and damned if they don't!

@ArishMell WE are damned if our governments allow this organisation to decide what is or isn't a pandemic (having recently changed the definition of a pandemic from a disease that kills many to a disease that can be caught by many, whether harmful or not), and thereafter to FORCE every individual (no exemptions, for faith or any other reason) to get injected with the gene-altering and mind-altering substances of their choice.

Thus natural immunity is cancelled. One's right over one's own body is cancelled. The principle "do no harm" is replaced by jargon using buzzwords like diversity and equal opportunities, etc etc.

This is global government in the name of "health". It's coming this year. No-one will be spared.

Damned, damned and double-damned.

But don't worry, friend! The sky is blue and all is well in the best of all worlds, for you, n'est ce pas?

@WalterF The terms "epidemic" and "pandemic" refer to rapid, wide distribution of infection, not lethality.

Virii don't know anything about "diversity" etc so para-political words like that should be irrelevant.

Natural immunity? Not at first, if a disease new to humans or to particular populations of them. It will develop and probably is now doing, partly by we adapting to the pathogen and partly by the pathogen adapting to us, but only after leaving huge numbers very ill or indeed dead. It won't go away and is still putting people in hospital, probably still killing some, and will continue to do so, though at much lower rates than in the early stages of the pandemic.

You bitterly criticise anyone on "political" grounds for trying to fight such outbreaks, whoever they are, however they try, but you what would you do about it? I don't imagine for one moment you would be so callous as to leave the disease to run and to Hell with the consequences as long as you survive, so what is your approach?

Oh, and I know many people, all vaccinated as I have been, but none complain of an "altered" mind as if by cannabis or heroin or LSD.... I doubt their "genes" have been altered either, whatever that scare might mean. Do you? Personally?

@ArishMell Not yet, for the altered mind - that's for their next pandemic. See my post of yesterday entitled HEALTH WARNING. This quotes adverse events listed in advance by the manufacturers of this future vaccine for a disease that has not developed yet. It's their word, not mine.

And as I have already said, in response to your question What would I have done? I would have applied the Pandemic Preparedness protocol worked out by the UK government several years in advance of covid - a sensible well thought-out way to deal with it, WITHOUT shutting the country down.

You have clearly not read the previous WHO definition of a pandemic (pre-2020) and their modified version, to fit the covid narrative. A pandemic, previously, was deadly, with a high death rate. Now, it's just a mild thing a lot of people get.

@WalterF I agree the Government should have been better prepared after all the planning it had done in the past, but that would not necessarily have meant no lock-downs. Hopefully it will have learnt; but democratic governments are very fickle things not good at planning beyond the next election. Their civil-services are, usually, but they can only do what the government of the day tells them; only to have the next lot elected in, go and change it all.

"Pandemic" and any disease-name are not synonyms; SARS_CoVid_19 was not "just a mild thing". It spread as a pandemic, and although perhaps most sufferers did manage to shake it off, it killed many, and left unexpected, strange long-term effects in many more.

Even if it was "just a mild thing" that alone would have created all sorts of problems with huge numbers of people unable to function, off work and so on for anything from a few days to weeks.

CoVid was a new disease although related to other respiratory ones (hence designing vaccines now that we hope will work against future new relations in that family); it spread very rapidly, and it produced all sorts of symptoms and effects of its own. Quite unlike its Cold and Influenza cousins have become over time, the common-cold is still incurable and though 'flu is not only still very unpleasant, it can even kill people already weak from other diseases.

I have a yearly "flu jab" and last year for the first time, one against the two dozen strains, I was told, of the Pneumonia once nick-named the "Old Man's Friend". It gained that grim moniker for killing relatively rapidly, people already dying very slowly and unpleasantly from other illnesses like cancer or Alzheimer's; but it can kill even otherwise healthy people.

I'm not actually sure though what your drive is though: simple anti-Covid vaccination campaigning, or a fear of anything authoritative that happens to include stringent public-health emergency measures.

@ArishMell I am talking about the change in the actual words of the WHO definition of "pandemic". I will try to find the two versions for you to compare. The clear watering-down of the definition sets the stage for the WHO to declare a pandemic for non-threats, and impose lockdowns, vaccinations etc - and if their pandemic agreement gets accepted, they will be able to do this at will.

By the way, the Head of the WHO, Tedros (for short), is a communist, previously an activist in South America, and has strong links with, and sympathies for, the Chinese Communist Party, with which the WHO has several chains of cooperation.

Alarm bells should be ringing.