The World Health Organisation Monster is Tightening its Grip

@Graylight Let's just wait and see who's right.

Remember, "equitable" is one of the WEF darling words. It means they (the "stakeholders") get their way, and John and Jane Doe lose out completely.

@ArishMell The basic selfishness of man is multiplied exponentially when he has bottomless money and power. He will do all he can to get more. And if he has all the money he could possibly ever need, he will go for more power.

I'm not going to say any more. You know exactly what I think. We will compare notes as time goes by. I just hope your generous and forgiving attitude to those who lord it over us proves to be justified. Because if it isn't, we are damned.

@WalterF Governmental organisations don't have bottomless money pits, and out own government for all its faults or strengths is elected; but I can see your point if you mean rich businessmen like Bill Gates, whom you seem to chuck in the same box as anyone else you don't trust!

@ArishMell Gates is one of them. He provides funds to many of them. Governments are small fry. But they seem to be attentive to what the NGOs require of them. E.g., they pass the laws that they want without consultation with the people and without parliamentary debate. We the people no longer have any say in what is imposed on us.

@PhoenixPhail

@ArishMell Not yet, for the altered mind - that's for their next pandemic. See my post of yesterday entitled HEALTH WARNING. This quotes adverse events listed in advance by the manufacturers of this future vaccine for a disease that has not developed yet. It's their word, not mine.

And as I have already said, in response to your question What would I have done? I would have applied the Pandemic Preparedness protocol worked out by the UK government several years in advance of covid - a sensible well thought-out way to deal with it, WITHOUT shutting the country down.

You have clearly not read the previous WHO definition of a pandemic (pre-2020) and their modified version, to fit the covid narrative. A pandemic, previously, was deadly, with a high death rate. Now, it's just a mild thing a lot of people get.

@WalterF I agree the Government should have been better prepared after all the planning it had done in the past, but that would not necessarily have meant no lock-downs. Hopefully it will have learnt; but democratic governments are very fickle things not good at planning beyond the next election. Their civil-services are, usually, but they can only do what the government of the day tells them; only to have the next lot elected in, go and change it all.

"Pandemic" and any disease-name are not synonyms; SARS_CoVid_19 was not "just a mild thing". It spread as a pandemic, and although perhaps most sufferers did manage to shake it off, it killed many, and left unexpected, strange long-term effects in many more.

Even if it was "just a mild thing" that alone would have created all sorts of problems with huge numbers of people unable to function, off work and so on for anything from a few days to weeks.

CoVid was a new disease although related to other respiratory ones (hence designing vaccines now that we hope will work against future new relations in that family); it spread very rapidly, and it produced all sorts of symptoms and effects of its own. Quite unlike its Cold and Influenza cousins have become over time, the common-cold is still incurable and though 'flu is not only still very unpleasant, it can even kill people already weak from other diseases.

I have a yearly "flu jab" and last year for the first time, one against the two dozen strains, I was told, of the Pneumonia once nick-named the "Old Man's Friend". It gained that grim moniker for killing relatively rapidly, people already dying very slowly and unpleasantly from other illnesses like cancer or Alzheimer's; but it can kill even otherwise healthy people.

I'm not actually sure though what your drive is though: simple anti-Covid vaccination campaigning, or a fear of anything authoritative that happens to include stringent public-health emergency measures.

@ArishMell I am talking about the change in the actual words of the WHO definition of "pandemic". I will try to find the two versions for you to compare. The clear watering-down of the definition sets the stage for the WHO to declare a pandemic for non-threats, and impose lockdowns, vaccinations etc - and if their pandemic agreement gets accepted, they will be able to do this at will.

By the way, the Head of the WHO, Tedros (for short), is a communist, previously an activist in South America, and has strong links with, and sympathies for, the Chinese Communist Party, with which the WHO has several chains of cooperation.

Alarm bells should be ringing.