Trump and indictment - question.

Trump apologists -

You like to say that everything against him is a politically motivated "witch hunt", and that he has not been indicted of any crime.

Suppose he gets indicted and convicted by a jury. What will you say then? Will you accept reality that Trump is a criminal, or will you still whine and protest? Is there anything at all that would convince you Trump has committed crimes?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

DavidT8899 · 22-25, M

Yes,there would.If someone actually produced credible evidence that he actually committed a prosecutable crime.

StevenIzzi · M

@DavidT8899 yes what? If hypothetically it were proven true with evidence you would no longer support him?

DavidT8899 · 22-25, M

@StevenIzzi It's not directly relevant to your question,but if you must know,I hope he doesn't get the nomination.I think he was by and large the best President of modern tines ,but I think certain people are too triggered by him to win the general election.I agree that no one's above the law,but certain people seem to think that he's below it.Every since he was elected,it's been one phony,rigged charge/investigation after another,all done by people who obviously have no interest in fairly upholding the law but who simply want to "get"Donald Trump and all costs.Sorry,but I have no faith in anything they say.

Convivial · 26-30, F

@DavidT8899 that's why there's a trial, to test such evidence

DavidT8899 · 22-25, M

@Convivial But when the evidence is false, obtained through unethical means and /or doesn't rise to the level of criminal conduct by any established standard,then there is no basis for a trial.

Convivial · 26-30, F

@DavidT8899 you are wrong on several areas there.
The evidence is tested in court as to its truth... That has not happened yet
If the evidence was gathered by noon lawful means then it will be inadmissible.

Any other questions based on logic rather than what you hope is true?

DavidT8899 · 22-25, M

@Convivial Well,we will just have to see where the case goes,won't we?If it ends up getting tossed,will you then abandon all logic and complain about how the justice system is hopelessly rigged in favor of Trump?

dale74 · M

@Convivial when you hold a trial you should be judged my Impartial jurors. If you have a juror who watches CNN MSNBC or any of the alphabet channels they are not impartial they've been listening for the last 6 years that hes guilty of this this this and this. Think about the Russian collusion they're still half the country that believe it even though it was investigated and found out to be made up by Hillary Clinton. So I have the country believes hes guilty of something well well they can't be in a trial.....

Convivial · 26-30, F

@dale74 i find it interesting that everyone else is either deluded or biased and only you and Trump supporters know the truth.

dale74 · M

@Convivial So you basically haven't watched the news when they do the 3 minutes after 2 years of saying hes guilty the 3 minutes of saying he was innocent and we were wrong you don't give that any credit which is why you're biased

Convivial · 26-30, F

@dale74 that's why there's a trial, to test the evidence

dale74 · M

@Convivial 1st off everybody on the grand jury was selected by the prosecutor. The prosecutor is biased. Everybody in that trial on that grand jury Have definitely been selected to find trump guilty no matter what the evidence. And you're never gonna get a fair trial unless you get 1st of all you can't get anyone that voted against trump and you can't get anybody who voted for trump because both parties would be biased.