Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Biden: "The idea we still allow semiautomatic weapons to be purchased is sick. It's just sick. It has no social redeeming values."

"Not a single, solitary rationale for it except profit for the gun manufacturer"


This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
calicuz · 51-55, M
The "Assault Rifle" is not the problem. An assault rifle can have the same caliber of ammunition that a handgun can have, and it's the ammunition that actually does the killing, the weapon of choice merely delivers the deadly ammunition.
We also must understand that we can not have the government, using weapons against "the people" without "the people" having access to the same weapons.
The problem lies in getting mentally ill people the mental health they need, including putting them in mental hospitals if that is necessary. Our leaders believe it's easier to issue a check every month to an individual with mental health issues, rather than put them in a hospital and get them real health care.
@calicuz You just argued in favor of ordinary civilians getting cruise missiles.
calicuz · 51-55, M
@LordShadowfire

Yeah, in a round about way, I guess I did.🤣
@calicuz

[quote] We also must understand that we can not have the government, using weapons against "the people" without "the people" having access to the same weapons.[/quote]
you have access to Apache helicopters and bunker busters kid?
Say something dumber..I bet you can’t
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Ryderbike Yup, you can, just apply for a license from the Feds
calicuz · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike

Yes, we have access, it's just the cost and Red Tape make it almost impossible to achieve ownership.
James25 · 61-69, M
@calicuz people who think like you are only a part of the problem. A very stupid ignorant viewpoint.
calicuz · 51-55, M
@James25

"The Constitution" is in place to protect us from Government Tyranny. I offered a solution. Amending "The Constitution" is not solving the problem. Criminals will always have access to firearms, why should "The People" also not have access to firearms legally?
@calicuz access to firearms if you have an effective back ground check and are qualified to own a firearm.

Proper gun legislation,
calicuz · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike

Yes, it's already in place. Am I wrong?
@calicuz how many references do you have to provide to purchase a firearm ?
calicuz · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike

None in my state.
@calicuz none in any state. That’s means you don’t do real back ground checks if you don’t have any information from people that know you.

References are a basic requirement for even a minimal back ground check,
calicuz · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike

Ok, I'm not against adding references to a firearms application, in fact I think that would be a good idea. That way any person with a mental health issue couldn't obtain a firearm if one of those references couldn't or wouldn't vouch for his full mental capacity.
@calicuz Right. Like the guy in Colorado who had previously threatened his mother with a bomb (?!?), yet was allowed to purchase a firearm. WTF is that?
@calicuz first thing you said that makes sense
calicuz · 51-55, M
@LordShadowfire

Yes, that was a Red Flag.