@
Strictgram They were pro Trump for decades. If even they have turned against Trump, that should tell you something (though it won't).
Here are some other reports on the shady deal:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-oversight-investigating-2b-saudi-investment-jared-kushners-firm-rcna31805
https://www.yahoo.com/news/jared-kushners-pe-firm-secured-094138450.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall#:~:text=Jared%20Kushner%20secured%20a%20%242%20billion%20investment%20for,senior%20advisor%20to%20his%20father-in-law%2C%20President%20Donald%20Trump.
https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner-saudi-arabia-deal-resurfaces-gop-republicans-hunter-biden-investigation-1760458
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-04-11/how-did-jared-kushner-get-2-billion-from-the-saudis
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jared-kushner-scores-2-billion-investment-from-saudi-arabia-report-11649700763
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/03/house-oversight-investigating-2b-saudi-investment-in-jared-kushners-firm.html
Is the Washington Examiner anti-Trump now? Here is their report on Kushner's shady deal:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jared-kushner-firm-received-2-billion-saudi-investment-after-white-house-exit-report
Will this do, or will you continue to hold out for facts that you like?