Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

BREAKING: AG Merrick Garland Names Former Hague Prosecutor Jack Smith as Special Counsel to Investigate Trump for Jan 6. and Mar-a-Lago Documents

Oh oh.

It’s getting very real now,
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Garland, an Obama nominee for the Supreme Court. Rejected. Picked up by the current administration. A flunky for Biden and a spiteful vindictive man who doesn’t have a clue.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@soar2newhighs i hate to get into a dispute with you, but who is Garland trying to spite? And if he wanted to spite tRump wouldn't he have simply indicted him now?
@samueltyler2 IMO he is ( probably pushed) w/ no backbone to tell Biden he does not have a reason to go after Trump. That is my opinion about him.
How many times are they going to go after this man?
And perhaps you didn’t see…this was announced right after Trump’s announcement to run in ‘24.
Again, my opinion on the man. You disagree that’s fine. But let’s see if and when this special counsel goes anywhere.
@soar2newhighs trumps a criminal who has been protected by Republican corruption .

Those days are over.
@soar2newhighs garland was not rejected. Quit lying.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@soar2newhighs ha, ha, no good try but you might also check your information about who 'rejected" his nomination. He was never even given a hearing in the Senate. It was Moscow Mitch who started a new type, which he then violated when your messiah was in office.
@samueltyler2 My messiah? C’mon, man, doc, you’re better than that. The last “ messiah” I thought was Barak, but hey, he’s busy tending to his mansion.
The violations that go on in the U. S. Government, God doesn’t believe.
SW-User
@soar2newhighs It's a hellworthy trespass for two men to wear the clothes of women and fondle each other.

Just sayin'.
@SW-User Sounds like you have issues with people you don’t like or agree with. You’re a hypocrite.
SW-User
@soar2newhighs Just reminding you where you will go if you go ahead with your sissy fanstasy.

hehe
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@soar2newhighs you are so far right,you will soon gall off of your flat earth!
@samueltyler2 I don’t think so. And BTW, what is “ far right”?
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@soar2newhighs look at yourself in the mirror.
@samueltyler2 Hey, disagreements not necessarily disputes. Different views on issue, where we agree to disagree. An exchange of views, feelings and opinions.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@soar2newhighs there are no alternative facts. Garland was never, ever rejected by trump of the Republicans, he didn't get even a chance. That is FACT. tRump stole documents from the Whitehouse, not even he denied that statement, it is FACT not debatable. This isn't disagreement, you are pushing lies!
@samueltyler2 You are getting yourself twisted over this. If you disagree, fine.
I’m enjoying a few cold ones, so I won’t be replying. You have a good one.
@samueltyler2 Unrelated to politics. I see you were a forensic person in medicine. I find that subject fascinating.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@soar2newhighs so ketones germane to this discussion. We seek the truth!
@samueltyler2 just saw that you were in forensic medicine, which I find interesting mostly in the various books I have read on it.
@soar2newhighs Using misinformation or disinformation to smear and subjugate anyone who believes that "No one is above the law" is typical of trump and his election deniers. I wont go over the past 6 years of trumps 'divide and conquer' attempts to destroy democracy and the Constitution. It's not debatable it's a fact. If trump isn't prosecuted and found guilty and sentenced for his obvious crimes, then that would mean "The cure is worse than the Disease." IMO. there is no way in hell that will happen.