Republicans increasing use of intimidation around ballot boxs

Republicans are resorting to intimidation to dissuade Democrats from voting in some areas.

Clearly these uneducated unemployed Republicans have nothing better to do with their days than hang out near voting stations trying to intimidate voters.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

redredred · M

Watching what’s actually going on is not intimidation unless one is afraid of what will be seen.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@redredred Legally, no. But only "legally". The goal *is* intimidation, and certainly some are feeling intimidated.

redredred · M

@trollslayer feelings are not facts. Toughen up buttercup. People have a right to watch.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@redredred watching with your face masked so you can not be identified, carrying weapons, that is certainly not just want ching!

SW-User

@trollslayer Even if that's true who cares? You are intimidated by a spider Mr Intrepid.

But if you expect spiders to be outlawed you've failed. Again

redredred · M

@samueltyler2 Let me get this straight, you want to deny people their rights to protect others “feelings”. Is that about right?

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@redredred You can watch sitting in your car. You don't need a firearm to watch, and certainly not out in display. You don't need to cover your face to watch. If you truly want to watch, and truly know that it is perfectly legal, you can sit in your car with binoculars, listen to your favorite music, and watch. Anything more is an attempt to intimidate, raise alarm, or cause a scene.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@redredred you are really pushing your nonsense, give up. Whose rights are those fully armed, camouflaged characters protecting?

SW-User

@samueltyler2 Sounds a bit like the Antifa boys you slap your 2" trouser trout to

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@trollslayer ANd that's not to say it is illegal. I'm just saying these folks have more "fantasies" than just "watching". I don't see how you can argue that.

redredred · M

@samueltyler2 I realize careful reading is a challenge for you but the rights in question are of those of the watchers.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@redredred what right do they have to intimidate others? You have to be kidding!

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M

@redredred taking peoples photos, noting their car plate number is normal?

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@soar2newhighs you are kidding, aren't you?

soar2newhighs

@samueltyler2 Kidding about what?

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@soar2newhighs reread what you wrote being aggressive against the armed, masked crowd.

soar2newhighs

@samueltyler2 I think I insinuated they could be ANTIFA. If that’s what you’re referring to; yes I believe that is possible.

redredred · M

@trollslayer I guess that’s what we call “tough”