Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Defraud the United States

A federal judge ordered a former Department of Justice official to hand over emails to the House select Jan. 6. committee. In doing so, he wrote that former President Donald Trump knowingly promoted false information about the 2020 election in court and in public.
On Wednesday, Judge David Carter of the Central District of California ordered former Trump DOJ official John Eastman to submit four emails to the committee after he tried to claim the correspondence is covered by executive privilege.

“The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public,” the judge wrote. “The Court finds that these emails are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
They had to go all the way to commiefornia to find a clown willing to do that! Amazing
@sunsporter1649 sounds like more q crap
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Ryderbike When did the department of injustice move to commiefornia?
@sunsporter1649 you mean an Orange County federal judge ruled on a case involving an orange county resident?

Say it ain’t so,
[quote]After graduating from college, Judge David Carter accepted a commission in the United States Marine Corps. He served in the Vietnam War where he fought in the Battle of Khe Sanh, receiving a Bronze Star for valor in 1968. He was medically discharged as a First Lieutenant after receiving a Purple Heart.[/quote]

An American Hero 🇺🇸 ✌️
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays Oh oh…trumpees will hate him,
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Ryderbike "Carter rejected the claim because attorney-client privilege does not apply if the discussion involved a crime."

Well, there goes attorney-client privilege down the drain
@sunsporter1649 does not apply to a discussion involving a crime

Awwww
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Ryderbike Well, there goes attorney-client privilege down the drain
@sunsporter1649 QAnon ^^^^^^^
@sunsporter1649 The crime fraud exception to attorney-client privilege.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@sunsporter1649 That exception has existed a long time.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@Ryderbike Eastman is a California resident and a professor of law at Chapman University in California, so was filing to have the subpoena squashed for attorney-client privilege in -- wait for it -- California. What a shock.@sunsporter1649
@dancingtongue now send it to sunsporter the QAnon trump freak
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@Ryderbike You're making a distinction between the two? Sorry, I meant to send it to the others.