Poetic Justice: NY Times MOCKS So-Called ‘Election Deniers’ … Regrets It The Very Next Day
Oh, what a difference a day can make.
On Monday, October 3, New York Times writer Stuart A. Thompson brushed off his best purple prose to cynically frame a story in the way the left’s media always does.
Rather than writing a story telling the five w’s about a specific incident — in this case, claims that election security had been endangered by a company alleged to have exposed the data of some 2 million poll watchers to foreign entities. Specifically, China.
Thompson waxed poetic about how ‘election deniers’ on the right were pushing ‘unfounded voter fraud claims’ and ‘unspooling a new conspiracy’.
The very next day, Thompon was forced to write another story. This one detailed the arrest of the same company’s CEO for exactly the issues he had scoffed at just one day earlier.
Oops
On Monday, October 3, New York Times writer Stuart A. Thompson brushed off his best purple prose to cynically frame a story in the way the left’s media always does.
Rather than writing a story telling the five w’s about a specific incident — in this case, claims that election security had been endangered by a company alleged to have exposed the data of some 2 million poll watchers to foreign entities. Specifically, China.
Thompson waxed poetic about how ‘election deniers’ on the right were pushing ‘unfounded voter fraud claims’ and ‘unspooling a new conspiracy’.
The very next day, Thompon was forced to write another story. This one detailed the arrest of the same company’s CEO for exactly the issues he had scoffed at just one day earlier.
Oops
70-79, M
