Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

My Book Banning Experience

In my highschool we had to take a class called Americanism Versus Communism or AVC to graduate. You could get exempt from the course if you took other humanities or history courses, but even then the AVC curriculum was presumed to be covered.

This was the early 80's.

Relevant to the AVC curriculum, there was this Soviet dissident, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was pretty famous and relevant at the time. He had been sentenced to hard labor for a private letter that criticized Joseph Stalin. After he was released, he became one of the most important socialist realist writers.

His novel, Gulag Archipelago, was originally published in the Soviet Union as samizdat. Underground published dissident work. It documented life in the political gulag, the forced labor camps. Sourced from his own experience while imprisoned. From diaries, interviews, various forms of media.

It's English translation was arguably one of the most important books in Soviet cold-war American. I got my copy in the pulp paperback racks. Back when grocery stores and drug stores sold such books. It was a big fat thick thing. A couple of bucks. But what that book represented was what this country opposed in Soviet communism in direct, immediate, human terms. Doris Lessing felt the book was so important that it brought down the Soviet system. Jordan Peterson, despite what people might think of him, seems to agree. He called it the most important book of the 20th century.

Well, I brought the book to school. It took some time to read.

My humanities teacher, my AVC mentor, took the book from me and tore it in half. And threw it away. Why? He wasn't going to have any of that commie trash in his class. And so that ended.

This is one of my concerns about book banning. The people banning the books really may have no idea what they are talking about. This is a common theme. Ayatollah Khomeini never read Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses. The prick who stabbed him, a few pages.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Docdon23 · M
Exactly. I would also add, in a free country, a democracy, we should welcome intelligent public debate and even disagreements--thinking and debating issues is how we progress...without examining critical sources we become stale and monolithic...and dictatorial.
@Docdon23 The counter argument to that-- a parent has the right to limit what textual material their child is exposed to, and a community has the right to limit what books are in the school or community libraries.

I have some sympathy for that argument based on arguments of choice and agency.

But I grieve for what is potentially lost in society with that approach.
Docdon23 · M
@CopperCicada I recently served on an elected Board of education, and we dealt with some of this. We all agree there should be thoughtful selection of books and sources, especially considering age appropriateness. I also agree parents should have a voice, but share your fear--limiting too much free thought and debate ends up in a bad place. Who decides what books should go? I just read where a town in Texas decided a book could be removed if a parent asked to do so--and someone then asked for the Bible to be removed...slippery slope for sure!!
LeeInTheNorthWoods · 70-79, F
@Docdon23 It seems to me that we can debate the relevance and usefulness of works of fiction and non-fiction. I'm unable to see the value of books with graphic text, and in some cases illustrations, about adult men having sexual relations with adolescent boys. In the state where I live, we've had parents read directly from books used in classes or purchased for the school library with just this type of prose. And parents who object are compared to "domestic terrorists".

I don't know if it does much good to point this out, but there is an easy-to-understand difference between conflicting intellectual concepts and carnal interests.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@LeeInTheNorthWoods I have mixed emotions about book banning. In general, I am mostly opposed, but i would want to remove books that are outside of the norm, as adult men having Ng sex with young children. But, when asked how to define what I would like removed, I can only say, I can't define it, but, know it when I see it.
@samueltyler2 Well. This is the problem. We used to know that Shakespeare and Chaucer were important English writers. But now they get banned along with some pedo porn graphic novel because they have sexual content. We used to know that the Diary of Anne Frank was a classic autobiography and historical document. But now we ban it because it has sexual content. Repeat with so many works of literature down to the Bible itself.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@CopperCicada that is why i sad I have mix d feelings. I agree that sounds me works that may be a bit graphic are classical works of art and should not be terminated.
@samueltyler2 This was a problem in my highschool as we went through Gardner's Art Through The Ages. And we went through classical Greek mythology. And you end up with nudity and sex. Some of it graphic. It bothered people.
LeeInTheNorthWoods · 70-79, F
@CopperCicada Well, yeah, but there is a BIG difference with an anatomically correct statue with a penis, and a text about graphic sex acts. My thought, anyway.
@LeeInTheNorthWoods I agree with you.
Docdon23 · M
@LeeInTheNorthWoods Oh, I agree there are certain age-appropriate and class-appropriate decisions to be made. That is not in general what is happening now. To Kill a Mockingbird being banned? But I do agree we don't simple accept EVERYTHING in every class.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LeeInTheNorthWoods
Well, yeah, but there is a BIG difference with an anatomically correct statue with a penis, and a text about graphic sex acts. My thought, anyway.

So, you may have freedom of speech but you don't have freedom to read what someone said.