Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

My Book Banning Experience

In my highschool we had to take a class called Americanism Versus Communism or AVC to graduate. You could get exempt from the course if you took other humanities or history courses, but even then the AVC curriculum was presumed to be covered.

This was the early 80's.

Relevant to the AVC curriculum, there was this Soviet dissident, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was pretty famous and relevant at the time. He had been sentenced to hard labor for a private letter that criticized Joseph Stalin. After he was released, he became one of the most important socialist realist writers.

His novel, Gulag Archipelago, was originally published in the Soviet Union as samizdat. Underground published dissident work. It documented life in the political gulag, the forced labor camps. Sourced from his own experience while imprisoned. From diaries, interviews, various forms of media.

It's English translation was arguably one of the most important books in Soviet cold-war American. I got my copy in the pulp paperback racks. Back when grocery stores and drug stores sold such books. It was a big fat thick thing. A couple of bucks. But what that book represented was what this country opposed in Soviet communism in direct, immediate, human terms. Doris Lessing felt the book was so important that it brought down the Soviet system. Jordan Peterson, despite what people might think of him, seems to agree. He called it the most important book of the 20th century.

Well, I brought the book to school. It took some time to read.

My humanities teacher, my AVC mentor, took the book from me and tore it in half. And threw it away. Why? He wasn't going to have any of that commie trash in his class. And so that ended.

This is one of my concerns about book banning. The people banning the books really may have no idea what they are talking about. This is a common theme. Ayatollah Khomeini never read Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses. The prick who stabbed him, a few pages.
Docdon23 · M
Exactly. I would also add, in a free country, a democracy, we should welcome intelligent public debate and even disagreements--thinking and debating issues is how we progress...without examining critical sources we become stale and monolithic...and dictatorial.
@LeeInTheNorthWoods I agree with you.
Docdon23 · M
@LeeInTheNorthWoods Oh, I agree there are certain age-appropriate and class-appropriate decisions to be made. That is not in general what is happening now. To Kill a Mockingbird being banned? But I do agree we don't simple accept EVERYTHING in every class.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LeeInTheNorthWoods
Well, yeah, but there is a BIG difference with an anatomically correct statue with a penis, and a text about graphic sex acts. My thought, anyway.

So, you may have freedom of speech but you don't have freedom to read what someone said.
I read Gulag Archipelago soon after it was published. I agree about its themes, meanings and importance.

I also read the Satanic Verses. The journalists keep saying it's about the life of the prophet Mohammed. It isn't. It's far more about issues of terrorism, trauma, love and madness.
The controversial sequences - about the Prophet, three of his "new" teachings, and his wives - all take place within the dreams and schizophrenic episodes of one of the protagonists - they are never represented as real and do not reflect on any aspect of Islam as it really is.

As you say, critics should read what they discuss before making pronouncements or decisions about the works.
hunkalove · 61-69, M
And most Christians have obviously never read The Bible.
@hunkalove Yes!
SW-User
The problem I have with this is 'book banning' has in our society has become a hyperbolic and reactive catch cry used quite cynically to apply to what children are explicit sexual content exposed to.

Its use in modern times is meant to evoke ridicule of purse cluthing dry crotched hysterics

The conversations are difficult to have if people don't read the books. We have to remember these books are being provided specifically for the education and entertainment of children.

Restricting children's access to sexually explicit material is not book banning in much the same way laws against having sex with children are not about restricting adult behavior

I am personally concerned that children are being exposed way too early to sexual content and we would be very naive to think that there aren't cynical forces at work in this.

We need to get out of kids pants.
Slade · 56-60, M
@SW-User and that’s right where he’s getting Satan’s giant barbed cock!
SW-User
@Slade 🤞
Slade · 56-60, M
@SW-User Just had a prostate test…little sensitive to that finger scheme! 😮
WTF? The guy didn't understand this at all!

Ass...

Of course you now have a copy, right?
SW-User
What did your parents do about the teacher destroying your personal property? That seems like something that would get a teacher in trouble.
@SW-User Well, I certainly didn't get support from my parents. They were teachers themselves and would side with the teacher in all cases. Even when they knew they were wrong.

But this was the 80's. Teachers could get away with alot of things. Any personal stuff could get taken really for no reason. The physics teacher would make us do push ups in front of the class if we got problems wrong.

 
Post Comment