Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

LA DA Recall Petiton and Invalid Signature Counts - Fallout?

Here in California, voters signed a petition to recall Los Angeles County DA because of his positions on what progressives call "criminal justice reform". Many deemed he was too soft on crime and initiated a petition to have him recalled on the ballot. The petition failed because approximately 200,000 of the 715,000 signatures were deemed invalid. Some were bogus, there were many duplicates, etc.

The thesis of this post is not about the DA himself or his views. It's the fact that about 28% of the signatures were invalid and consideration should be made about the general election process. This seems rather ominous when so many want essentially less oversight on general elections (more mail-ins, no voter ID, etc.). Now, granted, collecting petition signatures is different than a general election which requires voter registration and official ballots. But, when you consider even at the petition level, 28% of the signatures were invalid, how many general election registrations and/or ballots could be invalid and we'd never know it without voter verification and process quality validation?

I submit this is not about "left" vs. "right". Yes, all US citizens must be allowed to participate in elections. But, if we lose election integrity, we lose the country and potentially our freedoms. I'm not going to rehash the 2020 election... it's over and we have what we have. But when you look at how close it came in certain areas, significant determinate error could produce an invalid result. Kind of a scary thought. Heck, I'll probably be dead in 25 years. But you younger folks might do well to really think about this moving forward. After all, it will be your country.
4meAndyou · F
If you thought that this crooked DA would allow himself to be recalled, have another think.

This is his SECOND recall effort which has failed. They deliberately collected a lot more than the 500,000 votes they thought they would need because they disqualified 200,000 of them last time.

Coincydink? I don't think so.
rfatoday · 61-69, M
@4meAndyou Makes one wonder "who validates the validators?". So unfortunate trust has fallen by the wayside.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
There had to be some really sloppy amateurs running that petition signature gathering campaign.

You weed out the duplicates, the non-matching names, the people outside of the appropriate jurisdiction, non-registered voters, etc., BEFORE you turn in the signatures.

You check that stuff as you progress with the signature gathering, so you know how many more VALID ones you need.

What a bunch of dumbass amateurs! Trump will probably be hiring them as his legal counsel soon.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@beckyromero Yup, should have hired the professional ballot stuffers that work for the demonocrats in california
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@ rfatoday, Congress has the power to specify procedures for voting for federal offices. If they wanted to they could specify smoke signals. The States can establish their own rules for State and local offices and the State and federal offices could be on completely separate ballots with separate timelines.
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Make them show voter registration cards and identification
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Stereoguy When was the last time California went for the Repub presidential candidate? Anyone who knows anything can make very accurate predictions.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Stereoguy You can make a highly educated assumption based on the party registeration numbers and the results of previous elections in certain areas. It really isn't that hard to do. Do you think Dem candidates will become Governors in Texas and Florida?

 
Post Comment