Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

REPORT: Trump Is Under Investigation for Violating the ESPIONAGE ACT!!!

Lock him up!!! And throw away the key!!!


Donald Trump is under investigation for obstruction of justice and violating the Espionage Act, according to a search warrant obtained by multiple news outlets showing the FBI retrieved 11 sets of classified documents from Mar-a-Lago.

Meanwhile the former president insisted Friday that everything was 'declassified' and agents 'didn't need to seize anything.'

Some of the documents were marked 'top secret' and are meant to be kept in specialized government facilities, the [i]Wall Street Journal[/i] reported after seeing a copy of the search inventory.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11106833/FBI-recovered-ELEVEN-sets-classified-documents-Mar-Lago.html
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
Be honest, if he said he wouldn't run and probably win again, none of this would be happening.
@Coffeequilt 🤣🤣🤣
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
@Coffeequilt Jell be running alright:

Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
@SevIsPamprinYouAlways Not very creative, but 2 pts for trying
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
More creative than “Dems are running scared”. The last thing we’re doing is that. The first thing is basking in the level of schaudenfreude we’re all experiencing. Coffeequilt]
@Coffeequilt No. He still broke the law in a number of respects.

And he never won the popular vote.
Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
@SomeMichGuy We'll see about the first part. Read the constitution for your second point, sorry :(
Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
@SevIsPamprinYouAlways you are probably right about that. But my point is still right.
@Coffeequilt The Constitution doesn't say that Trump won the popular vote, sorry.

Yes, I am aware that the *Electoral* vote is what elects Presidents, but to have Republicans never have a majority Presidency is ludicrous.

Trump lost 3 elections in 2016 & 2020: both popular elections and the second electoral vote.
Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
@SomeMichGuy wow. You are right the Constitution doesn't mention Trump. Strong point 🤣

Try reading the rest of it
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Coffeequilt the deal the senate should have made with him during his sec nd impeachment, was a pass, agreement not to try him in return for never running for any office ever against n. No, the Republicans had to show their "manhood," and devotion to their demigod.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Coffeequilt please let us all in on your point?
Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
@samueltyler2 ummm, if English is a second language to you, please let know. Otherwise, try reading my post again. Sound out the words. Those 7 letters words are hard
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Coffeequilt don't be such a condescending neocon. What is it in the US Constitution that YOU seem to think you understand that the rest of us don't?
Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
@samueltyler2 no i just actually read it. Sorry, i thought you were mentally prepared.
Ummm, you have pretty hair. How's that for you?
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@Coffeequilt Wrong is wrong. Regardless of the time.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SomeMichGuy I hope you all realize that, initially, senators were not elected by a popular vote, but a system like the electoral college. That was eliminated as undemocratic. Why the presidency was left that way defies all logic, except it continues to give smaller states an interesting balanced advantage in electing a president!
@samueltyler2

? Senators were originally chosen by the State legislatures. Art. I, Sec. 3, Para. 1
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SomeMichGuy the state legislature is elected by the public, so the similarity is obvious, at least to me.
@samueltyler2 How so?

Electors are pledged for a specific candidate, even though they are usually minor party minions. The people vote for the candidate directly but the electors are part of the gerrymandered and "always 2 Senators"/"always 1 Representative" inflation of the power of low population states.

The Legislatures didn't have to let anyone know who the candidates for Senator were, nor disclose anything. People voted for representatives in the State Legislature, not the Senate candidates. Any internal gerrymandering didn't have interstate competition...

?
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SomeMichGuy The way the electoral college is set up, it favors the votes of the smaller states, since again, there are only 2 senators from each state and so small states have more power in the senate and then in the college. This was all part of the big compromise to get the southern states to be part of the independence movement leading up to 1776. At this time, the smaller states, and particularly the southern states, act more like federal money sponges and have too much power.
@samueltyler2 ...I am aware of the compromise. And I agree about the smaller states.

I ask again, how does the Electoral College look like the Legislature choosing Senators?
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SomeMichGuy I don't understand your last question. Before the popular vote elected US Senators, they were not elected by the citizens of the state. That is what I was saying.
@samueltyler2 You said that the Legislature deciding who would ve Senator looked like the Electoral College, but the two are very different.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SomeMichGuy I disagree, but we will not be able to resolve that. I see great similarities, the most important being, that, the citizen vote for senator did not really count as a vote for the senator, but for an elector, call it what you want.
"Senators of the United States Congress were originally chosen by state legislatures. Citizens would vote for their state legislators, and those legislators would vote a man into the U.S. Senate. At the beginning of the 20th century, though, many states had begun to use the popular vote to elect U.S. Senators."
One set are called electors, the other state legislators, but it amounts to the same thing, indirect voting, not direct. I would like the US presidential election to follow in those footsteps, let us, going forward, have the person who receives the most votes, become president.