Will Trump be indicted in Georgia ?

@Dainbramadge Why ?

@RodionRomanovitch just like all the other attempts there is no real merit just a twisted attempt at spin.

@Dainbramadge Well, you sure are living up to your username.

@Dainbramadge Threatening Raffensberger with legal consequences if he didn't 'find the votes' is of no merit , nor prima facie grounds to indict ?

@Dainbramadge If there is no real merit, how do you explain the call he made to Raffensperger?

@SW-User I just took a quick look and I can't find any transcripts of what he said just that he said something about finding enough votes to swing it in his favor.
Like I said earlier I smell a sad attempt at spin with this just like the other attempts.
I also said I don't know exactly what he said verbatim but I can only imagine it was something to the effect of we need to find blah blah blah number of votes so I win the election.
The spin would be he was implying that he wanted manufactured votes. But the truth would be that he just said that he needed that amount of votes to win.
Look at all the attempts they have made to indict him and made up charges just this same way.
Nothing ever came of the other attempts just like nothing ever came from the rape accusations.
This is just another attempt to disqualify him from running in 2024.

@Dainbramadge [quote]I just took a quick look and I can't find any transcripts of what he said [/quote]
I also took a quick look, and immediately found this:

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html

There is the full transcript along with the audio call.

I would actually say you [i]didn't want[/i] to find any transcripts of the call...

@Dainbramadge You really are not paying attention.

"spin" does not explain Trump, who--along with his supporters and followers--was called "a clear and present danger to Americam democracy" by a conservative former Federal judge (appointed by GHWB, I believe).

@Dainbramadge [quote]Look at all the attempts they have made to indict him and made up charges just this same way.[/quote] Yes, well, when he is tried by the Senate, what do you expect.

This, however, is a legal trial. There's no politics here :)

@SomeMichGuy people say stupid s*** all the time why would that be any different?

@Dainbramadge [quote]people say stupid s*** all the time [/quote]Is that going to be Trump's defence?

@SW-User see no evil , hear no evil 😄

@RodionRomanovitch Yup! 🙈🙉🙊

@SW-User okay I looked up a little bit more of this and wouldn't you know there isn't a sound bite to be found of what he actually said.
But according to a CNN reporter what he said was that this rapping bird your guy needed to find 11,870 votes in order for Trump to be able to win.
Did he say manufacturer 11,870 votes so I can win?
I seriously can't believe that you don't see an obvious pattern here. But I am just now hearing of this. Maybe you have a crystal ball that gives you different information than what I can find.

@SW-User why not it's true and directly to the point and get this makes perfect sense.

@Dainbramadge Right, let's try again.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Listen from 2.16 onwards.

@Dainbramadge So I find the exact evidence that you claim you can't find, and your response? You lose your shit :) Resorting to insults = You have lost :)

@SW-User you jackasses are writing simultaneously three at a f****** time.
I didn't have a chance to follow your link which I will now if you shut the f****** for a minute. But I will go ahead and make a prediction that I didn't need to listen to the audio in order to have made a very accurate assertion.

@Dainbramadge Then go ahead and listen from 2.16 onwards in the Washington Post clip I sent you and then re-evaluate your prediction.

Btw, I'm the only one writing at the moment.

@Dainbramadge [quote]Did he say manufacturer 11,870 votes so I can win?[/quote]
He didn't have to. It was implied. Find the votes or you're fired. That means make them up if you have to.

@LordShadowfire I can't believe you actually just said that line. I'm even going to tell you why I think it's so funny.
Before you made that comment I told my roommate about this conversation in a nutshell inside that I wouldn't be surprised if someone made damn near that exact statement.
If I put my hand in my pocket does that mean that I have a gun and that I am going to use that on you in an offensive manner?
Implied. There are so many ways that people can distort the implication of any statement. I mean actually it is a case of beauty being in the eyes of the beholder. There is no formula and yes I did listen to about 4 minutes of the transcripts starting around the 2-minute mark. What exactly was I supposed to hear? Just tell me directly in verbatim what was said that makes you think that he broke some kind of law? @SW-User

@SW-User @LordShadowfire I hope I didn't miss anything pertinent to respond to.
SamHainn you were making multiple comments and it was difficult to attempt to listen to the audio and keep up with what you guys were writing.
If I did miss something I apologize.
Also I hope you didn't think I was going to sit here for an hour listening to a phone conversation.
If he said he was going to fire that refriger or whatever his name is then point me to the timestamp so I can hear it for myself.
Oh and then give me a minute to go look at it.
And also I'm using talk to text and when I talk too fast it scrambles my words so you may have to use your imagination on a few of these comments.