Why do liberals blame the rich for our problems?

😨

Its impossible to even troll people who are as dumb and as reactionary as you.

@Karlbodge: Yep, that's me dumb and reactionary.

@Karlbodge: ahhh I was waiting for the condescending , self important libtard to show up . But you and your ilk lost the last 2 elections ... it's the economy stupid ! Isn't that what you used to chant ? The past 8 years have proven skin color does not a president make

@TexChik: You have no problem with his antisemitism then?

How can a woman support Trump after what he has said? You have such low expectations for how women should be treated.

@Karlbodge: How can women worry about some comments when Trump's opponent wanted to import rapists!

@Karlbodge: He's not an antisemite ... his son inlaw is Jewish 🙄.

And what man hasn't made a "not for mixed company" comment in a locker room or private conversation? What woman hasnt for that matter? Why be such a flaming hypocrite ? Libtards are all the same .

@satanburger: absolutely Right ! 👍

@TexChik:
Its not a justification for calling someone a filthy Jew.


Most (i.e. all) men I know have not bragged about sexual assault to the best of my knowledge. Also not been accused of sexual assault by multiple women.


Why need to import them when you are a rapist? Also, this is an appalling slur against immigrants but you don't care, right?

@Karlbodge: tell that to the parents of the women and children that have been raped and murdered by illegal aliens while working on farms and ranches , or hiding among us in cities. These aren't immigrants , they are criminals protected and coveted by the left because tgey are view as undocumented democrats . You libtards could care less who they assault allowing them to commit felonies with impunity. They only get deported and given sanctuary when they return in cities where libtards control the local governments ...in violation of immigration law . I could care less what you consider an "appalling slur" towards illegal aliens libtard ... AMERICA FIRST! Shove your globalist ideals. As obama said , " Losing elections has consequences".

you are just going to have to deal with it .

And it really doesn't matter what Trump said does it ? He's going to be president and he's going to undo all the crap obama did in the first few hours of his first day !

Trump said "you can do anything," which is not quite saying that they let him. Especially when he followed it up with the comment; "I don't even wait." The latter comment implies a lack of consent.


'Brash' comments implying a lack of consent alone are not enough but then Trump has been accused by MANY women who's allegations corroborate what Trump seemed to be saying in his own words.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/trump-and-the-truth-the-sexual-assault-allegations


Then I would condemn them equally. I don't think that rich white men are actually unfairly victimized by law or public opinion.


Trump has not been found guilty in a court of law, much as Hillary has not been found guilty of any impropriety in the email scandal but these are nonetheless issues of character that voters based their decisions on. I think that someone who has bragged about sexual assault and been accused of sexual assault by many women is not fit to be President. Others have different standards I guess.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/10/donald-trump/trump-says-clinton-laughed-about-rape-case/

I am not actually a big Clinton fan and I will be fair with what I accept and what I don't. Hillary did defend someone she believed was guilty and that is not something I would do. This is the work of a criminal lawyer and you could argue whether the nature of that job is morally ethical or not. You could also argue as to whether Trump's business practices were morally ethical.

One thing missing from your critique is any mention of the sexual assault allegations against Bill Clinton. I also believe that they are probably true, though less obviously so than the accusations against Trump. I hate Trump more than I like the Clinton's and my main beef here is with your casual dismissal of sexual assault claims, rather than your partisan bias.

@TexChik: There are courts of law to prosecute against rape and sexual assault, rather than by undocumented migrants or not. If you are an undocumented migrant it does not make your crime any greater or worse than if you are a rich white man.


Hmm... nah. I am gonna keep my globalist ideas because for now at least America is a democracy and we have freedom of speech. I will continue to oppose Trump, as will many others. Remember that Clinton was never really liked by much of the left and still got more votes than Trump. Political contestation continues.


He'll probably not do that but one of the ironies is that he is likely to do much more infrastructure spending than Obama ever did. I am actually OK with that big Government idea, as are you surely? ;-)

@satanburger: In addition, it is striking that you big problems with my political opinions but say nothing about anti-semetic insults from someone else on the thread. Presumably because you agree with him; morally and politically.

@Karlbodge: oh please ! Obama released the criminal illegals back onto our streets. The globalist agenda is treason ... the importance of the sovereignty of the US
FAR OUTWEIGHS the needs or desires of any immigrant or illegal alien

@Karlbodge: An interpretation of a comment is nothing solid.
Allegations are just that, allegations, and they coincidentally happened to come at a time when they could affect the election. The first allegation went to court, it was dismissed because they had nothing.(almost as if it was fabricated 😨) I'm sure if the others make it to court it will be the same.
Hillary as usual avoids going to court even though anyone else would have had to go to court for the emails. They certainly did find impropriety. It was illegal for her to even have those on her private computer. We can argue all day about her intentions, but what she did was illegal and certainly at the very least should have made it to a court to be decided.
Politifact is owned by a very Liberal newspaper it's a tool used to taint public opinion.

@TexChik:
Evidence please.

@1961dave:
Even the National Review think the allegations are true and they are ultra-Conservative.

This is reality bending denialism. Yes Hillary probably did breach protocol and have files (illegally) on a private server. Careless, wrong and illegal but hardly the crime of a century.

If you get brag about doing something and it then gets corroborated by twenty people, how likely is it that you are innocent?

@Karlbodge: Donald Trump has had Republicans attacking him ever since it was realized that he had a shot at winning. Establishment Republicans don't like him, he's not in the party's pocket. Your argument is entirely speculative, no matter how strongly you feel about it.

@satanburger: Yes of course this post was trolling and with the intention to satirize. But I got serious when people agreed with my piss-take arguments and then went even further. Its too much BS even for me. Pretending to hate jews 'cos its funny' is qualitatively different in intent to mocking racism.

You are using every obfuscation technique in the book. No there is not legal proof yet that Trump did those things but there is everything but. He bragged about sexual assault, women agree with him and so does America's most prestigious Conservative publication. The odds on him not having done those things are negligible, as deep down you know.

You are a reality denialist and you will make excuses for any rape not done by libtards.

I wish you all the best.

:-)

@Karlbodge: I agree with you except for the part about Hillary defending someone she believes was guilty. She was assigned the case by a judge and actually tried to get off the case.