If the right to private property is unlimited, people die, just like with gun rights-. But Canada's doing something about it?

Canada doesn't have a constitution with the same protections as the US Constitution. It seems that Trudeau is opening the floor for confiscation or control of private property in Canada. Property can be seized in the US but the owner must be fairly compensated and with the exception of seizures in the name of the "war on drugs", that is something that doesn't happen frequently. In Canada, handguns are already restricted severely by the government. It is unlawful to carry a handgun, unlawful to discharge a handgun except at an approved range, this also disallows firing on private property. The only lawful use is for target shooting and collecting. Trudeau's stated reason for limiting handguns in Canada was the shooting in Uvalde Texas. I hope Canadians realize that the gun used in Uvalde was a rifle, not a handgun, the type of rifle used in Texas is already banned in Canada as well as 1500 other rifles. The right to bear arms is not protected by Canadian law, Canadians are at the mercy of Mr. Trudeau's anti gun ideology.

Let him give up his private property first.

Sounds like step one of a massive asset seizure .

He said it's not "absolute" to be clear, before he went on to say that all the necessary steps for expropriation would be followed. I assume that means compensating the parties whose land is taken for a public purpose, just like in the US.

Back to the point, the right to own property is not [i]absolute[/i]. The Fifth Amendment even says that if it is confiscated, there has to be just compensation.

Fidel would be proud.

[media=https://youtu.be/bO4HnZ7XLsU]

You're trying to simplify it. It's much bigger than than.

Murka means a certain level of poverty right next to huge wealth. Deal with it.