Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If the right to private property is unlimited, people die, just like with gun rights-. But Canada's doing something about it?

Are you against doing stuff that might make life safe for even the poor?
How do you think about Trudeau's statement-. That private property is not an unlimited right?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Roadsterrider · 56-60, M
Canada doesn't have a constitution with the same protections as the US Constitution. It seems that Trudeau is opening the floor for confiscation or control of private property in Canada. Property can be seized in the US but the owner must be fairly compensated and with the exception of seizures in the name of the "war on drugs", that is something that doesn't happen frequently. In Canada, handguns are already restricted severely by the government. It is unlawful to carry a handgun, unlawful to discharge a handgun except at an approved range, this also disallows firing on private property. The only lawful use is for target shooting and collecting. Trudeau's stated reason for limiting handguns in Canada was the shooting in Uvalde Texas. I hope Canadians realize that the gun used in Uvalde was a rifle, not a handgun, the type of rifle used in Texas is already banned in Canada as well as 1500 other rifles. The right to bear arms is not protected by Canadian law, Canadians are at the mercy of Mr. Trudeau's anti gun ideology.