Would conservatives get everyone killed with guns or nuclear weapons just to avoid the dangers of a peaceful society?
61-69, F
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Human1000 Dems are not more effective at government, mr blue losses.
smiler2012 · 56-60
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@smiler2012 it's not. NATO exists to make war a more likely choice, AUKUS is the same.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Onestarlitnight the Dems. I wish that was a reason for others to dump the Dems-. But online we see a fake crowd drowning out the majority, and it's hard to tell.
SW-User
The thing is, if things are peaceful and prosperous you know the Republicans are not in power. They know it too...
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@SW-User the Dem party has endless war and no success against the guns proliferation.
SW-User
@Changeisgonnacome The reason there is no success against gun proliferation is because they are blocked at every opportunity by the Republicans. Endless war? What were the endless wars when Obama was in power? When Clinton was in Power?
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@SW-User bull. The Dems are in power, now. They don't have to stay in a stalemate with the other party. They're a two Party Monopoly, and they know that's illegal. They're conservatives.
MyNameIsHurl · 41-45, F
I know, thank god drugs are illegal and nobody can get their hands on them.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@MyNameIsHurl that's disinformation getting your country killed, of course. But you know.
Slade · 56-60, M
This thread is the ultimate flypaper for idiots stsrting with the OP
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Technically, yes but only for the views and the likes from "the base."
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.