For someone to lead your country, would you rather:
A: a weak leader, but you agree with their policies and what they stand for
B: a strong leader, but someone who also goes against everything you believe in, restrictive, crazy, etc
...
I guess ideally, both someone strong but also someone with good policies would be good,
But I'm bored and wondering what you doods would pick if it was either one or the other
Because why the heck not?
B: a strong leader, but someone who also goes against everything you believe in, restrictive, crazy, etc
...
I guess ideally, both someone strong but also someone with good policies would be good,
But I'm bored and wondering what you doods would pick if it was either one or the other
Because why the heck not?
