This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Elessar · 31-35, M

Elessar · 31-35, M
@Ducky You're expressing a position that is itself radical, and that consists in having to continuously reposition oneself at a perceived centre and appear "moderate" or even "super parties", no matter what. "Both sides bad" is a common rhetoric in such ideology.
You can find more about it googling "radical centrism" or "enlightened centrism".
You can find more about it googling "radical centrism" or "enlightened centrism".
Elessar · 31-35, M
@Ducky But mine wasn't an attempt at "pack mentality" or being part of any crowd, just pointing out that this position is potentially no more and no less radical and prone to be politicised (and taken advantage of) than the two better recognizable extremes. It's just an (external / trying-to-be external?) opinion/observation of mine; you're free to do what you want with it, I'm not going to force you to see things any differently if you'll decide to dismiss it.
To be clear, I don't think you're ill-intentioned; I think you're perhaps just exhausted/overwhelmed (idk if it's the right term?) towards the continuous and increasing conflict between the two historical parties, and so you're trying to find a balance, blaming equally the two fronts for the present situation.
To be clear, I don't think you're ill-intentioned; I think you're perhaps just exhausted/overwhelmed (idk if it's the right term?) towards the continuous and increasing conflict between the two historical parties, and so you're trying to find a balance, blaming equally the two fronts for the present situation.