Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Perhaps Mr. Shapiro should refrain from discussing matters of which he knows nothing?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
redredred · M
I don’t actually see any holes in his logic. Can you point them out?
@redredred Biological sex is male and female. Gender identity is man, woman, and non-binary. So some males are women, but saying some men are women makes no sense and betrays his ignorance of a topic he speaks about ALL THE TIME.
@redredred I could, but it would do no good.
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne so you can’t, got it.
@redredred I can. Pregnant women should have the freedom to do as they please, or do you disagree with that?
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne no disagreement but if it’s true that a person born male can become a woman by simply identifying as a woman, then it follows that such a person can have standing in all questions regarding women.

Or did I miss something?
@redredred You are deliberately and intentionally pretending ignorance in order to justify encouraging the oppression of others.
@redredred When it comes to abortion, it's not really a gender thing, though. Trans men can get preggers too.
Though I don't really like the "no uterus, no opinion" argument, anyway. It's very illogical.
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne You are projecting your own motives onto others. All I’m pointing out is an obvious intellectual inconsistency.
@redredred Wrong. You are hiding behind it because you know full well that as a libertarian, you have no grounds to suggest that abortion should be banned. Therefore, you are intentionally obfuscating using transgender persons. You are intellectually dishonest, sir.
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne Projecting some more, I see. I’m not hiding anything I’m just pointing out a painfully obvious logical disconnect on the left.
@redredred I project nothing. You used your own twisted version of the definition of a transgender person in order to justify degrading women and taking away their rights.
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne Calm down there ace. I’m humiliating no one; you’re humiliating yourself. It’s inescapable that there’s a logical disconnect here. Such disconnects are pretty common among what passes for leftist “thought”
@redredred I am calm, sir. You are the one who is so distraught as to be unable to read and comprehend my previous post.
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne Sure you are. You just normally overreact to having your lack of logic pointed out.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
redredred · M
@CorvusBlackthorne Thesis: Only a woman has standing to discuss women’s reproductive issues.
Antithesis: Anyone, irrespective of natal gender assignment, can be a woman.
Synthesis: All people can potentially have standing to discuss women’s reproductive issues.

Is it easier if I use lefttard Hegelian Dialectic format?