Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Mental Disorder: Woke MSNBC Claims You’re a ‘Neo-Nazi’ if You Exercise

This from the nitwits at MSNBC:

"It appears the far right has taken advantage of pandemic at-home fitness trends to expand its decade-plus radicalization of physical mixed martial arts (MMA) and combat sports spaces.

Earlier this month, researchers reported that a network of online “fascist fitness” chat groups on the encrypted platform Telegram are recruiting and radicalizing young men with neo-Nazi and white supremacist extremist ideologies. Initially lured with health tips and strategies for positive physical changes, new recruits are later invited to closed chat groups where far-right content is shared.

Physical fitness has always been central to the far right. In “Mein Kampf,” Hitler fixated on boxing and jujitsu, believing they could help him create an army of millions whose aggressive spirit and impeccably trained bodies, combined with “fanatical love of the fatherland,” would do more for the German nation than any “mediocre” tactical weapons training.

The intersection of extremism and fitness leans into a shared obsession with the male body, training, masculinity, testosterone, strength and competition. Physical fitness training, especially in combat sports, appeals to the far right for many reasons: fighters are trained to accept significant physical pain, to be “warriors,” and to embrace messaging around solidarity, heroism, and brotherhood. It’s championed as a tool to help fight the “coming race war” and the street battles that will precede it."
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Are they recruiting them in order to join the Azov battalion in Ukraine?
@BizSuitStacy Actually, in Ukraine that is something that does happen.
@BizSuitStacy Why don't you ask your commandant if they are?
@LeopoldBloom That's your team Leo.
@BizSuitStacy Azov is right wing like all nazi idiots. 🤦‍♂️
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Yes...they are nazis. Congratulations. You got one right. Right wing? Wrong. Classic ignorant mistake. Nazis are fascists...and this group is in bed with the globalists. Lefties just like you.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@BizSuitStacy globalists? Lolwut? The Nazis and other fascists are against globalism and internationalism, they' are/were ultranationalists.
@basilfawlty89 In those circles "globalist" is the new euphemism for Jews usually. Based on the old conspiracy theory that internationalist politics like bolsheviks were a Jewish plot or some nonsense.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@BizSuitStacy It's amusing how many idiots try to ignore history and claim Nazis & Fascists were left wing.

But you can't deny that in Germany in the 1930s & 40s,
the Nazis bitterly opposed the Social Democrats
the Nazis bitterly opposed the Socialists;
the Nazis bitterly opposed the Trade Unionists;
and the Nazis bitterly opposed the Communists.

When I say "bitterly opposed" it means the Nazis sent brownshirt thugs to disrupt rallies and fight in the streets against their political opponents. The Nazis were a reactionary party reacting against the left wing in Germany at the time. The Nazis built their platform on racism, nationalism, and fear of the foreign.
@ElwoodBlues Now that you've chimed in, I know I'm right.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@BizSuitStacy if they were leftists, why were they ultranationalists, privatised industry and championed traditionalism?
@BizSuitStacy Ignoring all logic and data, you go straight for the ad hominem attack. That's you admitting the facts are all against you and you are wrong, LOL!!!
@ElwoodBlues Ignoring facts like the term Nazi standing for the National Socialist German Workers' Party? I'm sure they were just kidding. Wake the Hell up...the Nazis despised capitalism. Gov't had a big hand in planning the economy, heavy gov't spending for programs to push toward full employment. Yes...there were private businesses. So what? Socialists do allow for ownership of private property, private business. They hated communism. They hated capitalism even more. So what economic system did the Nazis operate within?
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@BizSuitStacy actually, socialism does not. You're confusing social democracy for socialism. Social democracy uses a mixed economy. Socialism means workers ownership of the means of production.
@basilfawlty89 not true. Communism doesn't allow for the ownership of private property. And everything is centrally planned.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@BizSuitStacy entirely true. Social democracy is capitalism with government intervention, a welfare state and public institutions. It's still a form of capitalism. See Keynesian economics. This is basic economic theory. It's clear you've never researched economics or political science.
@basilfawlty89 That's all political science. You're simply describing a market based economy with social programs. The only variable is the extent of those programs. Much of western Europe today is accused of being socialist and it's really not.
@BizSuitStacy
I'm sure they were just kidding
The Nazis were lying and pretending to support the working class. Lying as a possibility didn't occur to you?

Ask yourself: who owned the means of production under Hitler?
Answer: private business owners, not the state.
Ask yourself : what property was expropriated by the state?
Answer: only the Jewish citizens lost their property.

Sure, the Nazis had a YUGE military industrial complex, but it involved the state contracting with private businesses to purchase weapons like planes and guns and tanks. All totally capitalistic. Who do you think made the Messershmitt aircraft? Who made the Mauser rifles? What shipyards built the battleships? Look into the history of IG Farben & Volkswagen!

That's all political science.
You're making a political science claim about a form of government, and objecting to political science evidence? Lordy!!
@BizSuitStacy
That's all political science.

So your issue is they are arguing based on facts?
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@BizSuitStacy and your point being? Social democracy isn't socialism. It has some elements of socialism like welfare, single payer national healthcare and free education, but it's still capitalism. It's based on Keynesian economics.

The Nazis were corporatists. They operated on a mixed economy too, but with no rights for workers to strike or collectively bargain. Further more there was strict hierarchy in the workplace. That goes completely against socialism which advocates workers ownership of the means of production and workplace democracy.
@BizSuitStacy
Ignoring facts like the term Nazi standing for the National Socialist German Workers' Party?


So your entire argument is "it has socialist in the name so facts don't matter.

By your logic a seahorse is an equine.
@BizSuitStacy
yo...dipshit...Hitler and company were socialists

That is factually wrong. Fascists and socialists are complete opposites. Try basing something on actual facts instead of the feelings of people like Glenn Beck.
@ElwoodBlues
The Nazis were lying and pretending to support the working class

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 ignorance abounds. Yes. I hear that from your type. Ohhh...they were just pretending. Just telling the people what they want to hear.

the Nazis had a YUGE military industrial complex, but it involved the state contracting with private businesses to purchase weapons like planes and guns and tanks. All totally capitalistic.
Thank you! You just demonstrated you clearly do not understand what capitalism is. The gov't dictating to private businesses what to produce, and using tax dollars to pay for it - is NOT capitalism. That be some socialism there Woody.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@BizSuitStacy erm...no tha would not be socialism. If it was socialism there would be no private businesses. Again, please research what corporatism is. It was literally created to opposed socialism and class conflict.

Why do you think the first concentration camp victims were socialists, communists, anarchists and trade unionists?