Documents of Secession by the confederate states.
For all those people that keep persisting that the southern states just were angry about "states-rights" because you can't seem to get "slavery" over your tongue. Just read the documents that these people wrote and why they wanted to move away from the Union. If you don't think it was about slavery, you just were just too lazy to look up and see what these parties had to say for themselves.
[b][big]South Carolina[/big][/b]
[quote][b]Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union[/b]
[i]The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of [b]the other slaveholding States[/b], she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.[/i]
[...]
[i]The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. [b]But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution.[/b] The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; [b]but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.[/b][/i]
[...]
[i]On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.
The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. [b]The [u]slaveholding States[/u] will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.[/b][/i]
[...][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp
[b][big]Georgia[/big][/b]
[quote][b]Confederate States of America - Georgia Secession[/b]
[i]The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. [b]For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery.[/b][/i] [...]
[...]
[i]The Presidential election of 1852 resulted in the total overthrow of the advocates of restriction and their party friends. Immediately after this result the anti-slavery portion of the defeated party resolved to unite all the elements in the North opposed to slavery an to stake their future political fortunes upon their hostility to slavery everywhere. This is the party two whom the people of the North have committed the Government. They raised their standard in 1856 and were barely defeated. They entered the Presidential contest again in 1860 and succeeded.
[b][u]The prohibition of slavery in the Territories, hostility to it everywhere, the equality of the black and white races, disregard of all constitutional guarantees it its favor,[/u][/b] were boldly proclaimed by its leaders and applauded by its followers.
With these principles on their banners and these utterances on their lips the majority of the people of the North demand that we shall receive them as our rulers.
[b]The prohibition of slavery in the Territories is the cardinal principle of this organization[/b][/i]
[...]
[i]Such are the opinions and such are the practices of the Republican party, who have been called by their own votes to administer the Federal Government under the Constitution of the United States. We know their treachery; we know the shallow pretenses under which they daily disregard its plainest obligations. If we submit to them it will be our fault and not theirs. [b]The people of Georgia have ever been willing to stand by this bargain, this contract; they have never sought to evade any of its obligations; they have never hitherto sought to establish any new government; they have struggled to maintain [u]the ancient right of themselves and the human race[/u] through and by that Constitution. But they know the value of parchment rights in treacherous hands, and therefore they refuse to commit their own to the rulers whom the North offers us. Why? Because by their declared principles and policy they have outlawed $3,000,000,000 of our property in the common territories of the Union; put it under the ban of the Republic in the States where it exists and out of the protection of Federal law everywhere; because they give sanctuary to thieves and incendiaries who assail it to the whole extent of their power, in spite of their most solemn obligations and covenants; because their avowed purpose is to subvert our society and subject us not only to the loss of our property but the destruction of ourselves, our wives, and our children, and the desolation of our homes, our altars, and our firesides. To avoid these evils we resume the powers which our fathers delegated to the Government of the United States, and henceforth will seek new safeguards for our liberty, equality, security, and tranquillity.[/b]
[/i][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp
[b][big]Mississippi[/big][/b]
[quote][b]A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union.[/b]
[i]In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.
[b]Our position is [u]thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery[/u]-- the greatest material interest of the world.[/b] Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.[/i]
[...][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp
[b][big]Texas[/big][/b]
[quote][b]A declaration of the causes which impel the State of Texas to secede from the Federal Union.[/b]
[...]
[i]Texas abandoned her separate national existence and consented to become one of the Confederated States to promote her welfare, insure domestic tranquility [sic] and secure more substantially the blessings of peace and liberty to her people. She was received into the confederacy with her own constitution, under the guarantee of the federal constitution and the compact of annexation, that she should enjoy these blessings. [b]She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery--the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits--[u]a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time.[/u] Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy. Those ties have been strengthened by association.[/b] But what has been the course of the government of the United States, and of the people and authorities of the non-slave-holding States, since our connection with them?[/i]
[...]
[i]In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States, [b]based upon the unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of the equality of all men, irrespective of race or color--[u][b]a doctrine at war with nature[/u][/b], [b][u]in opposition to the experience of mankind[/u][/b], and [b][u]in violation of the plainest revelations of the Divine Law.[/u][/b] They demand the abolition of negro slavery throughout the confederacy, the recognition of political equality between the white and the negro races, and avow their determination to press on their crusade against us, so long as a negro slave remains in these States.[/b][/i]
[...]
[i][u][b]We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.[/b][/u]
[b]That in this free government all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding States.[/b][/i]
[...]
[/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ref/abouttx/secession/2feb1861.html
[b][big]Cornerstone Speech (1861)[/big][/b]
On top of all that, Alexander H. Stephens [i](Georgia)[/i] gave a speech as the vice president of the confederacy on the 21st of March 1861. He explains the reason for the revolt and the creation of the confederacy:
[quote][...]
[...] [i][b]The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. [u]This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution.[/u][/b] Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split." He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. [b]The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with[/b], but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. [b]Those ideas, however, were [u]fundamentally wrong[/u]. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races.[/b] This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the "storm came and the wind blew."
[b]Our new government is founded upon [u]exactly the opposite[/u] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is [u]not[/u] equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his [u]natural and normal condition.[/u] This, [u]our new government,[/u] is the first, in the history of the world,[u] based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.[/u][/b] This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North, who still cling to these errors, with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics. Their conclusions are right if their premises were. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. [b][u]They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.[/u][/b][/i]
[...]
- Alexander H. Stephens, [i]Vice-President of the Confederate states, 21st of March 1861[/i][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/cornerstone-speech/
[b][big]South Carolina[/big][/b]
[quote][b]Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union[/b]
[i]The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of [b]the other slaveholding States[/b], she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.[/i]
[...]
[i]The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. [b]But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution.[/b] The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; [b]but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.[/b][/i]
[...]
[i]On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.
The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. [b]The [u]slaveholding States[/u] will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.[/b][/i]
[...][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp
[b][big]Georgia[/big][/b]
[quote][b]Confederate States of America - Georgia Secession[/b]
[i]The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. [b]For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery.[/b][/i] [...]
[...]
[i]The Presidential election of 1852 resulted in the total overthrow of the advocates of restriction and their party friends. Immediately after this result the anti-slavery portion of the defeated party resolved to unite all the elements in the North opposed to slavery an to stake their future political fortunes upon their hostility to slavery everywhere. This is the party two whom the people of the North have committed the Government. They raised their standard in 1856 and were barely defeated. They entered the Presidential contest again in 1860 and succeeded.
[b][u]The prohibition of slavery in the Territories, hostility to it everywhere, the equality of the black and white races, disregard of all constitutional guarantees it its favor,[/u][/b] were boldly proclaimed by its leaders and applauded by its followers.
With these principles on their banners and these utterances on their lips the majority of the people of the North demand that we shall receive them as our rulers.
[b]The prohibition of slavery in the Territories is the cardinal principle of this organization[/b][/i]
[...]
[i]Such are the opinions and such are the practices of the Republican party, who have been called by their own votes to administer the Federal Government under the Constitution of the United States. We know their treachery; we know the shallow pretenses under which they daily disregard its plainest obligations. If we submit to them it will be our fault and not theirs. [b]The people of Georgia have ever been willing to stand by this bargain, this contract; they have never sought to evade any of its obligations; they have never hitherto sought to establish any new government; they have struggled to maintain [u]the ancient right of themselves and the human race[/u] through and by that Constitution. But they know the value of parchment rights in treacherous hands, and therefore they refuse to commit their own to the rulers whom the North offers us. Why? Because by their declared principles and policy they have outlawed $3,000,000,000 of our property in the common territories of the Union; put it under the ban of the Republic in the States where it exists and out of the protection of Federal law everywhere; because they give sanctuary to thieves and incendiaries who assail it to the whole extent of their power, in spite of their most solemn obligations and covenants; because their avowed purpose is to subvert our society and subject us not only to the loss of our property but the destruction of ourselves, our wives, and our children, and the desolation of our homes, our altars, and our firesides. To avoid these evils we resume the powers which our fathers delegated to the Government of the United States, and henceforth will seek new safeguards for our liberty, equality, security, and tranquillity.[/b]
[/i][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp
[b][big]Mississippi[/big][/b]
[quote][b]A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union.[/b]
[i]In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.
[b]Our position is [u]thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery[/u]-- the greatest material interest of the world.[/b] Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.[/i]
[...][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp
[b][big]Texas[/big][/b]
[quote][b]A declaration of the causes which impel the State of Texas to secede from the Federal Union.[/b]
[...]
[i]Texas abandoned her separate national existence and consented to become one of the Confederated States to promote her welfare, insure domestic tranquility [sic] and secure more substantially the blessings of peace and liberty to her people. She was received into the confederacy with her own constitution, under the guarantee of the federal constitution and the compact of annexation, that she should enjoy these blessings. [b]She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery--the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits--[u]a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time.[/u] Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy. Those ties have been strengthened by association.[/b] But what has been the course of the government of the United States, and of the people and authorities of the non-slave-holding States, since our connection with them?[/i]
[...]
[i]In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States, [b]based upon the unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of the equality of all men, irrespective of race or color--[u][b]a doctrine at war with nature[/u][/b], [b][u]in opposition to the experience of mankind[/u][/b], and [b][u]in violation of the plainest revelations of the Divine Law.[/u][/b] They demand the abolition of negro slavery throughout the confederacy, the recognition of political equality between the white and the negro races, and avow their determination to press on their crusade against us, so long as a negro slave remains in these States.[/b][/i]
[...]
[i][u][b]We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.[/b][/u]
[b]That in this free government all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding States.[/b][/i]
[...]
[/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ref/abouttx/secession/2feb1861.html
[b][big]Cornerstone Speech (1861)[/big][/b]
On top of all that, Alexander H. Stephens [i](Georgia)[/i] gave a speech as the vice president of the confederacy on the 21st of March 1861. He explains the reason for the revolt and the creation of the confederacy:
[quote][...]
[...] [i][b]The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. [u]This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution.[/u][/b] Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split." He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. [b]The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with[/b], but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. [b]Those ideas, however, were [u]fundamentally wrong[/u]. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races.[/b] This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the "storm came and the wind blew."
[b]Our new government is founded upon [u]exactly the opposite[/u] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is [u]not[/u] equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his [u]natural and normal condition.[/u] This, [u]our new government,[/u] is the first, in the history of the world,[u] based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.[/u][/b] This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North, who still cling to these errors, with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics. Their conclusions are right if their premises were. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. [b][u]They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.[/u][/b][/i]
[...]
- Alexander H. Stephens, [i]Vice-President of the Confederate states, 21st of March 1861[/i][/quote]
[b]SOURCE:[/b] https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/cornerstone-speech/
