Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join Similar Worlds today »

Chuck Schumer Unveils Legislation to Make Voter Fraud Legal in the US



Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer introduced a sweeping voter rights bill that will make voter fraud the law of the land.

The legislation amounts to a federal takeover of the elections – a dream for Democrats despite clear language in the US Constitution that clearly puts this responsibility in the state’s hands.
Good! Let’s put that fraud to good use. 🤡
RogueLoner · 61-69, M
The [b]rule[/b] is: If I don't vote for them, I don't have to obey them. I "learned" this from the Democrat's precedent in 2016. I don't make the rules, and the liberal Democrats are much smarter than I.

carpediem · 61-69, M
[@609293,RogueLoner] Excellent observation. I agree
RogueLoner · 61-69, M
[@112526,carpediem] Sure, and since liberals are intellectually superior and never wrong...🤷‍♂️ THEY set the precedent, not I.
carpediem · 61-69, M
[@609293,RogueLoner] Also ok to loot for the same reasons.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Everybody votes, dead civil war veterans, 16 year old's, convicted murderers, anyone with a copy machine, illegal aliens....
Virgo79 · 56-60, M
[@494950,sunsporter1649] and my dog😌
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
[@349935,Virgo79] Ahead of the last election I received, in the mail, a voter registration inquiry from a group in Tallahassee saying there is a Mrs. Jones at my address that has not registered to vote, and enclosing a voter registration form. Mrs. Jones is my pet duck
Virgo79 · 56-60, M
[@494950,sunsporter1649] I got two mail in ballots, never ask for any.
I've only voted in person in the past.
TexChik · F
Scotus will slap that down, the constitution is very clear about the state's controlling their own elections. They dont have the votes
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
[@113373,TexChik] "WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday said it will not hear a case out of Pennsylvania related to the 2020 election, a case that had lingered while similar election challenges had already been rejected by the justices.

The high court directed a lower court to dismiss the case as moot.

The justices had in February, after President Joe Biden’s inauguration, rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election. In the case, the court rejected Monday, however, the court had called for additional briefing that was not complete until the end of March.

The case involved a federal court challenge to a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision requiring election officials to receive and count mailed-in ballots that arrived up to three days after the election. More broadly, however, the case concerned whether state lawmakers or state courts get the last word about the manner in which federal elections are carried out.

The Democratic National Committee was among those that argued the case should be rejected as moot because the 2020 election is over. Those that brought the case said the justices should hear it because the issues involved are important and recurring."

demonocrats now free to run elections any way the feel is advantageous to them
carpediem · 61-69, M
The left is pulling out all the stops. Why not admit outright they're commies trying to overturn our society. That's what it is in reality.
4meAndyou · F
[@112526,carpediem] So true. We can't kill them. They are our fellow citizens...but every time I hear the new poisonous twists and turns, I WANT to.
carpediem · 61-69, M
[@387713,4meAndyou] I hear ya.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
What a POS
Virgo79 · 56-60, M
We all just need to keep voting then🤷‍♂️
Let them pile up
Hope he doesn't drown in votes😂
justanothername · 51-55, M
People voted, no one wanted the antagonist so the antagonist lost but the antagonist and his fan boys got really pissy that all the people that they pissed off voted against them.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
[@539784,justanothername] And what else did the tooth fairy tell you?
Budwick · 70-79, M
[@539784,justanothername]
justanothername · 51-55, M
[@841775,Budwick] Looks like the intelligence gene clearly skipped a generation where you are concerned.
MotherHubbard · 56-60, F
Without major changes in that direction, the USA won't be able to say it's a modern democracy. Lol. It's a long shot.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
[@1201621,MotherHubbard] One man, 350 votes, right?
MotherHubbard · 56-60, F
[@494950,sunsporter1649] whatever! 5 corporations, All the news and all the wars.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
[@1201621,MotherHubbard] So stay under the porch, nobody can bother you there

 
Post Comment
 
10269 people following
Politics
Personal Stories, Advice, and Support
New Post
Associated Groups Category Members