Biden White House Officially Craps On 1st Amendment

[b]
Biden White House Wages War on 1st Amendment, ‘We Support the Need For Social Media Platforms to Take Steps to Reduce Hate Speech’[/b]

When asked if Biden supports the continued ban of Trump from social media, Psaki said the Biden White House supports “the need for social media platforms to continue to take steps to reduce hate speech.”

[b]There is no such thing as “hate speech” and the US Supreme Court has reaffirmed this many times.[/b]

All speech is protected under the 1st Amendment, but the Biden White House openly admits it is working with Big Tech to censor and ban conservatives under the guise of ‘reducing hate speech.’

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

REMsleep · 41-45, F

Yes. I'm not up on all the fine details but I disagree with limiting speech. But it is not any social media platform's job to protect anything. They are companies.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@REMsleep Like bakeries?

REMsleep · 41-45, F

@sunsporter1649 A company does not have to publish online anything that they don't want to.
A bakery cannot refuse by law to serve people based on color, gender, sexual orientation but they can refuse to write certain words on a cake or decorate with rainbows or whatever.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@REMsleep Why not just go to another bakery?

Budwick · 70-79, M

@REMsleep [quote]A company does not have to publish online anything that they don't want to.[/quote]

So, Facebook and Twatter are publishers?
Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes

It's like they want the best of both worlds, ain't it?

REMsleep · 41-45, F

@Budwick I don't know how they classify themselves. I know that just like most companies they will say what suits them when they need to.
But they are responsible for publishing individual user generated content online at their discretion.
I somewhat agree about going to another bakery as I would not want to give money to someone that doesn't want to serve my kind but legally everyone should be protected from discrimination. This is a must.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@REMsleep LOL, like Conservatives should be protected from the assaults by the left-wing nut jobs in the media and in congress?

REMsleep · 41-45, F

@sunsporter1649 Attacking someone with an opposite opinion or even spreading half truths is not illegal and this is done by people on both sides without a doubt. Mud slinging has always exsisted.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@REMsleep LOL, and now it it up to an obscene level, including the promotion of the silencing of any and all opposition views including removing news sites from television and the banning of reading material, both print and net. Now I wonder who is promoting that?

REMsleep · 41-45, F

@sunsporter1649 If you think for one moment that one side is more guilty than the other you are wrong.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@REMsleep You mean Conservatives are babbling all over tv and the print media to abolish left-wing nut job media?

This message was deleted by the author of the main post.