This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Remind me, did "the people" storm the capitol building and break in a couple weeks ago?
lol come on, bud. That attack was planned and sadly there are indeed a large number of Trump cultists who are ready, willing and able to do violence.
So yeah, there are consequences to actions.
Deal with it.
Your hero lost the election and now you're comforting yourself by lashing out at every single thing you can.
It's a coping mechanism, nothing more.
lol come on, bud. That attack was planned and sadly there are indeed a large number of Trump cultists who are ready, willing and able to do violence.
So yeah, there are consequences to actions.
Deal with it.
Your hero lost the election and now you're comforting yourself by lashing out at every single thing you can.
It's a coping mechanism, nothing more.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu You mean there is a list of approved riots!
Adaydreambeliever · 56-60, F
@sunsporter1649 not speaking for Pikachu but no, that's not at all what was said - or meant. That's quite obvious to most people, but you seem to be the exception
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Adaydreambeliever [quote]not speaking for Pikachu [/quote]
But, it kind of looks like that's exactly what you are doing.
But, it kind of looks like that's exactly what you are doing.
Adaydreambeliever · 56-60, F
@Budwick No bud, it only looks like that to you because you weren't able to see it any other way than your own slanted way :P The saying, 'not speaking for... ' is perfectly acceptable English meaning, I agree with that person. And clearly I do and clearly I felt you needed a little more by way of explanation as you were lacking in comprehension. You are most welcome