Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Suppose the entire election is found to be Void and Invalid due to pervasive Fraud?

I'm no Constitutional scholar, but what little I know tells me there is no clear solution.

So, what do you think?

Cheaters concede?
Revolution?
Election Do-Over?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArtieKat · M
I'm in England so maybe you won't accept my opinion: the general view in Europe is that as no tangible evidence [of fraud]has been put before the courts thus far, the election results will be upheld.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@ArtieKat Regardless of your location, you failed to answer the question.

The reality is that there is enormous evidence of fraud.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@Budwick Why hasn't it been produced & why are Trump lawyer's telling courts it's not about fraud?!!!
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Harriet03 The evidence is overwhelming and openly discussed in court and hearings that are not reported on.

It IS about fraud.
Uachtarain · 31-35, M
@Budwick you must be right. The fact that
the evidence is overwhelming and openly discussed in court
must be the reason why Trump’s so-called legal team 🤡 have won every single one of...oh wait..,🤭
4meAndyou · F
@ArtieKat We all know they've been smothering us with those assertions, which are incorrect...the media notwithstanding. It really requires knowledge of each state's election laws, and the many violations thereof. Most of the states with the alleged fraud have bypassed the state's legislature...sort of a kangaroo style election...and the clerks, courts, and whomever have just decided to do things any which way.
ArtieKat · M
@Budwick When Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon they found it was made of green cheese. It was hushed up in case people thought they were crackers.🤣
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ArtieKat · M
@4meAndyou You are using English words [like "thereof" and "whomever"] but I haven't got a clue what you're really saying.
4meAndyou · F
@ArtieKat I will refrain from being snotty...since you are unable.

Most of the states with the alleged fraud have bypassed the state's legislature...sort of a kangaroo style election...and the clerks, courts, and whomever have just decided to do things any which way.

Each state has election laws. They are determined by the state legislature. When a group of clerks decide to change the election procedures bypassing the legislature, it is an illegal procedure. When an attorney general or a Secretary of State change election procedures without running the changes through the state legislature it is an illegal procedure.

Violations of state laws have occurred.
ArtieKat · M
@4meAndyou Thank you. I'll continue to watch from the sidelines.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
@Budwick Where is that evidence you claim exists yet are unable to disclose in a court or indeed anywhere else
Driver2 · M
@4meAndyou you explain well 😊
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Dlrannie I guess you haven't been following very close. Try watching the public hearings being held in various states. Lots of evidence of fraud being presented. Sadly the US constitution does not have a mulligan clause. It has other remedies of which I am not really happy but I do understand that mulligans are a bit of a mugs game.
Uachtarain · 31-35, M
@hippyjoe1955
lots of evidence of fraud bring presented

The trouble is, you forget to mention that all the so-called evidence is then laughed out of the respective courts.

Not looking good for old Trumpelstiltskin now does it? 🤭
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Uachtarain Not yet. Wait and see child. Rome was not built in a day. The real cases are just recently entered and the rejection of them simply hastens the day that they come before the supreme court. I heard that Georgia managed to wipe all the machines yesterday despite a court order not to do so. I then saw a video of the machines being moved once again against a court order. If there was no fraud I have no idea why they are so busy trying to cover their tracks.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
@hippyjoe1955 Public Hearings organised by the Republican Party or for that matter any other party are not the same as putting evidence in front of a Law Court.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Dlrannie No they were open hearings where evidence was presented. Do try to keep up.
Frank52 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955
I heard

That's legally admissible evidence?
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@hippyjoe1955 then provide the link to the video you saw.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
@hippyjoe1955 Still not in a court of Law though were they.