View 1 more replies »
hamsterdance · 46-50, M
@Dominus I was thinking in terms of all the companies that got PPP loans (which aren't actually loans).
Or the corporations who are subsidized.
Or the corporations who get federal money.
Literally everybody gets federal money like it is Christmas.
Stop pretending that libtards are the only people getting taxes (that you probably don't pay)
Or the corporations who are subsidized.
Or the corporations who get federal money.
Literally everybody gets federal money like it is Christmas.
Stop pretending that libtards are the only people getting taxes (that you probably don't pay)
Dominus · 36-40, M
@hamsterdance
I have paid into social security every single year as a full time employee since the age of 15. I have paid federal, state and income taxes every single year since the age of 16 as a full time employee.
I was referencing how the blue states fund the red states. I put something up even Donald Trump could understand, pictures.(Considering who I was responding to) But to break it down into more detail;
1. Virginia
• Net federal funding: $10,301 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $176.8 billion (5th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.1 percent (8th lowest)
• Median household income: $71,535 (9th highest)
2. Kentucky
• Net federal funding: $9,145 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $70.8 billion (19th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.1 percent (8th highest)
• Median household income: $48,375 (7th lowest)
3. New Mexico
• Net federal funding: $8,692 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $31.7 billion (19th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 17.4 percent (the highest)
• Median household income: $46,744 (5th lowest)
4. West Virginia
• Net federal funding: $7,283 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $24.6 billion (15th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 16.8 percent (2nd highest)
• Median household income: $43,469 (the lowest)
5. Alaska
• Net federal funding: $7,048 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $13.0 billion (8th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.8 percent (tied - 22nd lowest)
• Median household income: $73,181 (7th highest)
6. Mississippi
• Net federal funding: $6,880 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $37.8 billion (21st least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.3 percent (6th highest)
• Median household income: $43,529 (2nd lowest)
7. Alabama
• Net federal funding: $6,694 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $65.8 billion (21st most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.0 percent (9th highest)
• Median household income: $48,123 (6th lowest)
8. Maryland
• Net federal funding: $6,035 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $105.1 billion (11th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.3 percent (17th lowest)
• Median household income: $80,776 (the highest)
9. Maine
• Net federal funding: $5,572 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.4 billion (10th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.8 percent (17th highest)
• Median household income: $56,277 (20th lowest)
10. Hawaii
• Net federal funding: $5,270 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $19.9 billion (13th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.7 percent (20th lowest)
• Median household income: $77,765 (3rd highest)
11. Arkansas
• Net federal funding: $5,080 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $35.1 billion (20th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.8 percent (25th highest)
• Median household income: $45,869 (3rd lowest)
12. South Carolina
• Net federal funding: $5,008 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $59.7 billion (23rd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3 percent (tied - 19th highest)
• Median household income: $50,570 (9th lowest)
13. Arizona
• Net federal funding: $4,430 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $82.8 billion (14th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.8 percent (tied - 22nd lowest)
• Median household income: $56,581 (23rd lowest)
14. Oklahoma
• Net federal funding: $3,986 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $45.1 billion (23rd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.2 percent (tied - 12th highest)
• Median household income: $50,051 (8th lowest)
15. Missouri
• Net federal funding: $3,949 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $72.3 billion (18th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.0 percent (23rd lowest)
• Median household income: $53,578 (15th lowest)
16. Montana
• Net federal funding: $3,808 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $12.2 billion (6th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.4 percent (14th lowest)
• Median household income: $53,386 (14th lowest)
17. Louisiana
• Net federal funding: $3,785 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $52.0 billion (25th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 16.4 percent (3rd highest)
• Median household income: $46,145 (4th lowest)
18. Vermont
• Net federal funding: $3,741 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $8.0 billion (3rd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.5 percent (24th lowest)
• Median household income: $57,513 (24th lowest)
19. Tennessee
• Net federal funding: $3,591 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $76.3 billion (17th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.5 percent (11th highest)
• Median household income: $51,340 (10th lowest)
Idaho
20. Idaho
• Net federal funding: $3,428 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.5 billion (11th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.7 percent (16th lowest)
• Median household income: $52,225 (11th lowest)
21. North Carolina
• Net federal funding: $3,358 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $113.1 billion (9th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3 percent (tied - 19th highest)
• Median household income: $52,752 (13th lowest)
22. Delaware
• Net federal funding: $2,892 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $11.5 billion (5th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.4 percent (18th lowest)
• Median household income: $62,852 (17th highest)
23. Ohio
• Net federal funding: $2,750 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $125.7 billion (8th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.2 percent (tied - 12th highest)
• Median household income: $54,021 (16th lowest)
24. Oregon
• Net federal funding: $2,477 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $45.7 billion (24th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.4 percent (tied - 4th highest)
• Median household income: $60,212 (20th highest)
25. Michigan
• Net federal funding: $2,474 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $108.4 billion (10th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.1 percent (14th highest)
• Median household income: $54,909 (18th lowest)
26. Indiana
• Net federal funding: $2,359 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $67.8 billion (20th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.3 percent (13th lowest)
• Median household income: $54,181 (17th lowest)
27. Pennsylvania
• Net federal funding: $2,299 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $155.8 billion (6th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.9 percent (tied - 15th highest)
• Median household income: $59,195 (24th highest)
28. Georgia
• Net federal funding: $2,253 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $104.5 billion (12th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.6 percent (18th highest)
• Median household income: $56,183 (19th lowest)
29. Rhode Island
• Net federal funding: $2,228 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $12.6 billion (7th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.4 percent (tied - 4th highest)
• Median household income: $63,870 (15th highest)
30. Florida
• Net federal funding: $2,187 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $237.7 billion (3rd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.6 percent (10th highest)
• Median household income: $52,594 (12th lowest)
31. Kansas
• Net federal funding: $1,983 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $31.3 billion (18th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.7 percent (6th lowest)
• Median household income: $56,422 (21st lowest)
32. South Dakota
• Net federal funding: $1,409 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $9.3 billion (4th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9 percent (tied - 12th lowest)
• Median household income: $56,521 (22nd lowest)
33. Nevada
• Net federal funding: $1,140 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $28.7 billion (16th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.2 percent (22nd highest)
• Median household income: $58,003 (25th lowest)
34. Iowa
• Net federal funding: $1,105 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $29.9 billion (17th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.6 percent (15th lowest)
• Median household income: $58,570 (25th highest)
35. Minnesota
• Net federal funding: $959 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $64.4 billion (22nd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.8 percent (7th lowest)
• Median household income: $68,388 (12th highest)
36. Wyoming
• Net federal funding: $670 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $7.1 billion (the least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.3 percent (tied - the lowest)
• Median household income: $60,434 (19th highest)
37. Wisconsin
• Net federal funding: $536 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $55.4 billion (25th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.6 percent (19th lowest)
• Median household income: $59,305 (22nd highest)
38. Texas
• Net federal funding: $304 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $269.0 billion (2nd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.0 percent (tied - 23rd highest)
• Median household income: $59,206 (23rd highest)
39. Utah
• Net federal funding: $296 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $23.9 billion (14th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.8 percent (3rd lowest)
• Median household income: $68,358 (13th highest)
40. California
• Net federal funding: $12 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $436.1 billion (the most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9 percent (tied - 12th lowest)
• Median household income: $71,805 (8th highest)
41. Colorado
• Net federal funding: -$95 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $57.5 billion (24th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.6 percent (5th lowest)
• Median household income: $69,117 (11th highest)
42. Nebraska
• Net federal funding: -$164 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.7 billion (12th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.3 percent (9th lowest)
• Median household income: $59,970 (21st highest)
43. Washington
• Net federal funding: -$184 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $80.5 billion (15th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3 percent (tied - 19th highest)
• Median household income: $70,979 (10th highest)
44. New Hampshire
• Net federal funding: -$234 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $15.0 billion (9th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.0 percent (4th lowest)
• Median household income: $73,381 (6th highest)
45. Illinois
• Net federal funding: -$364 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $131.8 billion (7th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.9 percent (tied - 15th highest)
• Median household income: $62,992 (16th highest)
46. North Dakota
• Net federal funding: -$720 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $7.9 billion (2nd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.3 percent (tied - the lowest)
• Median household income: $61,843 (18th highest)
47. New York
• Net federal funding: -$1,792 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $220.6 billion (4th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.8 percent (7th highest)
• Median household income: $64,894 (14th highest)
48. Massachusetts
• Net federal funding: -$2,343 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $78.7 billion (16th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.7 percent (25th lowest)
• Median household income: $77,385 (4th highest)
49. New Jersey
• Net federal funding: -$2,368 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $97.7 billion (13th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9 percent (tied - 12th lowest)
• Median household income: $80,088 (2nd highest)
50. Connecticut
• Net federal funding: -$4,000 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $41.1 billion (22nd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.0 percent (tied - 23rd highest)
• Median household income: $74,168 (5th highest)
Stop pretending that libtards are the only people getting taxes (that you probably don't pay)
I have paid into social security every single year as a full time employee since the age of 15. I have paid federal, state and income taxes every single year since the age of 16 as a full time employee.
I was referencing how the blue states fund the red states. I put something up even Donald Trump could understand, pictures.(Considering who I was responding to) But to break it down into more detail;
1. Virginia
• Net federal funding: $10,301 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $176.8 billion (5th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.1 percent (8th lowest)
• Median household income: $71,535 (9th highest)
2. Kentucky
• Net federal funding: $9,145 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $70.8 billion (19th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.1 percent (8th highest)
• Median household income: $48,375 (7th lowest)
3. New Mexico
• Net federal funding: $8,692 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $31.7 billion (19th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 17.4 percent (the highest)
• Median household income: $46,744 (5th lowest)
4. West Virginia
• Net federal funding: $7,283 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $24.6 billion (15th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 16.8 percent (2nd highest)
• Median household income: $43,469 (the lowest)
5. Alaska
• Net federal funding: $7,048 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $13.0 billion (8th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.8 percent (tied - 22nd lowest)
• Median household income: $73,181 (7th highest)
6. Mississippi
• Net federal funding: $6,880 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $37.8 billion (21st least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.3 percent (6th highest)
• Median household income: $43,529 (2nd lowest)
7. Alabama
• Net federal funding: $6,694 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $65.8 billion (21st most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.0 percent (9th highest)
• Median household income: $48,123 (6th lowest)
8. Maryland
• Net federal funding: $6,035 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $105.1 billion (11th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.3 percent (17th lowest)
• Median household income: $80,776 (the highest)
9. Maine
• Net federal funding: $5,572 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.4 billion (10th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.8 percent (17th highest)
• Median household income: $56,277 (20th lowest)
10. Hawaii
• Net federal funding: $5,270 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $19.9 billion (13th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.7 percent (20th lowest)
• Median household income: $77,765 (3rd highest)
11. Arkansas
• Net federal funding: $5,080 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $35.1 billion (20th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.8 percent (25th highest)
• Median household income: $45,869 (3rd lowest)
12. South Carolina
• Net federal funding: $5,008 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $59.7 billion (23rd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3 percent (tied - 19th highest)
• Median household income: $50,570 (9th lowest)
13. Arizona
• Net federal funding: $4,430 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $82.8 billion (14th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.8 percent (tied - 22nd lowest)
• Median household income: $56,581 (23rd lowest)
14. Oklahoma
• Net federal funding: $3,986 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $45.1 billion (23rd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.2 percent (tied - 12th highest)
• Median household income: $50,051 (8th lowest)
15. Missouri
• Net federal funding: $3,949 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $72.3 billion (18th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.0 percent (23rd lowest)
• Median household income: $53,578 (15th lowest)
16. Montana
• Net federal funding: $3,808 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $12.2 billion (6th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.4 percent (14th lowest)
• Median household income: $53,386 (14th lowest)
17. Louisiana
• Net federal funding: $3,785 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $52.0 billion (25th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 16.4 percent (3rd highest)
• Median household income: $46,145 (4th lowest)
18. Vermont
• Net federal funding: $3,741 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $8.0 billion (3rd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.5 percent (24th lowest)
• Median household income: $57,513 (24th lowest)
19. Tennessee
• Net federal funding: $3,591 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $76.3 billion (17th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.5 percent (11th highest)
• Median household income: $51,340 (10th lowest)
Idaho
20. Idaho
• Net federal funding: $3,428 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.5 billion (11th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.7 percent (16th lowest)
• Median household income: $52,225 (11th lowest)
21. North Carolina
• Net federal funding: $3,358 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $113.1 billion (9th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3 percent (tied - 19th highest)
• Median household income: $52,752 (13th lowest)
22. Delaware
• Net federal funding: $2,892 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $11.5 billion (5th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.4 percent (18th lowest)
• Median household income: $62,852 (17th highest)
23. Ohio
• Net federal funding: $2,750 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $125.7 billion (8th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.2 percent (tied - 12th highest)
• Median household income: $54,021 (16th lowest)
24. Oregon
• Net federal funding: $2,477 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $45.7 billion (24th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.4 percent (tied - 4th highest)
• Median household income: $60,212 (20th highest)
25. Michigan
• Net federal funding: $2,474 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $108.4 billion (10th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.1 percent (14th highest)
• Median household income: $54,909 (18th lowest)
26. Indiana
• Net federal funding: $2,359 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $67.8 billion (20th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.3 percent (13th lowest)
• Median household income: $54,181 (17th lowest)
27. Pennsylvania
• Net federal funding: $2,299 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $155.8 billion (6th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.9 percent (tied - 15th highest)
• Median household income: $59,195 (24th highest)
28. Georgia
• Net federal funding: $2,253 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $104.5 billion (12th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.6 percent (18th highest)
• Median household income: $56,183 (19th lowest)
29. Rhode Island
• Net federal funding: $2,228 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $12.6 billion (7th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.4 percent (tied - 4th highest)
• Median household income: $63,870 (15th highest)
30. Florida
• Net federal funding: $2,187 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $237.7 billion (3rd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.6 percent (10th highest)
• Median household income: $52,594 (12th lowest)
31. Kansas
• Net federal funding: $1,983 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $31.3 billion (18th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.7 percent (6th lowest)
• Median household income: $56,422 (21st lowest)
32. South Dakota
• Net federal funding: $1,409 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $9.3 billion (4th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9 percent (tied - 12th lowest)
• Median household income: $56,521 (22nd lowest)
33. Nevada
• Net federal funding: $1,140 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $28.7 billion (16th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.2 percent (22nd highest)
• Median household income: $58,003 (25th lowest)
34. Iowa
• Net federal funding: $1,105 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $29.9 billion (17th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.6 percent (15th lowest)
• Median household income: $58,570 (25th highest)
35. Minnesota
• Net federal funding: $959 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $64.4 billion (22nd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.8 percent (7th lowest)
• Median household income: $68,388 (12th highest)
36. Wyoming
• Net federal funding: $670 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $7.1 billion (the least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.3 percent (tied - the lowest)
• Median household income: $60,434 (19th highest)
37. Wisconsin
• Net federal funding: $536 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $55.4 billion (25th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.6 percent (19th lowest)
• Median household income: $59,305 (22nd highest)
38. Texas
• Net federal funding: $304 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $269.0 billion (2nd most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.0 percent (tied - 23rd highest)
• Median household income: $59,206 (23rd highest)
39. Utah
• Net federal funding: $296 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $23.9 billion (14th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.8 percent (3rd lowest)
• Median household income: $68,358 (13th highest)
40. California
• Net federal funding: $12 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $436.1 billion (the most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9 percent (tied - 12th lowest)
• Median household income: $71,805 (8th highest)
41. Colorado
• Net federal funding: -$95 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $57.5 billion (24th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.6 percent (5th lowest)
• Median household income: $69,117 (11th highest)
42. Nebraska
• Net federal funding: -$164 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.7 billion (12th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.3 percent (9th lowest)
• Median household income: $59,970 (21st highest)
43. Washington
• Net federal funding: -$184 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $80.5 billion (15th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3 percent (tied - 19th highest)
• Median household income: $70,979 (10th highest)
44. New Hampshire
• Net federal funding: -$234 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $15.0 billion (9th least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.0 percent (4th lowest)
• Median household income: $73,381 (6th highest)
45. Illinois
• Net federal funding: -$364 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $131.8 billion (7th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.9 percent (tied - 15th highest)
• Median household income: $62,992 (16th highest)
46. North Dakota
• Net federal funding: -$720 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $7.9 billion (2nd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.3 percent (tied - the lowest)
• Median household income: $61,843 (18th highest)
47. New York
• Net federal funding: -$1,792 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $220.6 billion (4th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.8 percent (7th highest)
• Median household income: $64,894 (14th highest)
48. Massachusetts
• Net federal funding: -$2,343 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $78.7 billion (16th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.7 percent (25th lowest)
• Median household income: $77,385 (4th highest)
49. New Jersey
• Net federal funding: -$2,368 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $97.7 billion (13th most)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9 percent (tied - 12th lowest)
• Median household income: $80,088 (2nd highest)
50. Connecticut
• Net federal funding: -$4,000 per resident
• Total revenue from fed. gov.: $41.1 billion (22nd least)
• SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.0 percent (tied - 23rd highest)
• Median household income: $74,168 (5th highest)
This is Wag the Dog--he is creating violence and disturbances so he can then combat it with force and claim to be a law and order president--all to rally his base for re-election. Meanwhile, people are dying of a virus he never too seriously and their are racial issues in our country he does not acknowledge or understand.
4meAndyou · F
Yes. Rioting, gang violence, attempts to deface or destroy government property, and dead children in the streets are not being addressed by the Woke Mayor and Governor, who are apparently asleep on the job.
There are clear guidelines for "sending in people". Ideally, when Mayors and Governors are sane, they request help from the feds when mobs and riots and gang violence are out of control, as they clearly are in NYC. This Governor and this Mayor are intent on being WOKE, instead of protecting their citizens and have defiled the oaths they took upon being sworn into office.
The reason this is happening is the chuckle-headed clownish decision to defund the police, and to remove the plainclothes undercover officers from duty there. The plainclothes undercover force has since been restored...that's how bad it got with gun violence.
There are federal agencies already, with offices in NYC. The FBI, ATF and DHS all have offices there. Federal Agents do NOT need permission from Governors or Mayors to go where their jobs demand they go.
DHS is tasked by the law which was created by Congress to protect federal buildings. If they do not, then they are derelict in their duties, (like the Governors and Mayors in these radicalized states and cities). They do not need permission from anyone to perform this duty.
Further, "Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secret Service is authorized to detect and arrest any person who violates—
… any of the laws of the United States relating to electronic fund transfer frauds, access device frauds, false identification documents or devices, and any fraud or other criminal or unlawful activity in or against any federally insured financial institution; except that the authority conferred by this paragraph shall be exercised subject to the agreement of the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security and shall not affect the authority of any other Federal law enforcement agency with respect to those laws.
So, that means if someone in a city commits fraud with a wire transfer or uses false ID to commit a crime, that is a violation of federal law, and federal agents have to ask NO ONE for permission to go in and arrest the criminal."
18 U.S. Code §3056 Powers, authorities, and duties of United States Secret Service
http://djhjmedia.com/rich/federal-agents-do-not-need-permission-to-go-into-cities-to-enforce-federal-laws-heres-why/
ATF is supposed to "target, identify, and dismantle criminal enterprises with ties to violent crime, that traffic illicit liquor or contraband tobacco in interstate commerce; seize and deny their access to assets and funds; and prevent their encroachment into the legitimate alcohol or tobacco industry."
The FBI is charged with finding and jailing criminals of all sorts, including local and foreign intelligence crimes, and finding and jailing terrorists of all sorts and is supposed to work with the Department of Justice to accomplish those goals.
The DEA or drug enforcement agency can be deployed at any time, anywhere, also without permission
U.S. Marshals, also deployed in Portland: "the Marshals occupy a uniquely central position in the federal justice system. It is the enforcement arm of the federal courts, and as such, it is involved in virtually every federal law enforcement initiative.
Presidentially appointed U.S. Marshals direct the activities of 94 districts — one for each federal judicial district. More than 3,752 Deputy Marshals and Criminal Investigators form the backbone of the agency. Among their many duties, they apprehend more than half of all federal fugitives, protect the federal judiciary, operate the Witness Security Program, transport federal prisoners and seize property acquired by criminals through illegal activities."
Since a federal courthouse in Portland was firebombed there, with people locked inside by the rioters from the OUTSIDE this is definitely part of their jurisdiction.
In NYC, as in Chicago, the gang violence needs to be controlled. The federal agencies are already there.
Cuomo and DiBlasio are just killing more people if they can find a judge anywhere who will take this issue up in court.
There are clear guidelines for "sending in people". Ideally, when Mayors and Governors are sane, they request help from the feds when mobs and riots and gang violence are out of control, as they clearly are in NYC. This Governor and this Mayor are intent on being WOKE, instead of protecting their citizens and have defiled the oaths they took upon being sworn into office.
The reason this is happening is the chuckle-headed clownish decision to defund the police, and to remove the plainclothes undercover officers from duty there. The plainclothes undercover force has since been restored...that's how bad it got with gun violence.
There are federal agencies already, with offices in NYC. The FBI, ATF and DHS all have offices there. Federal Agents do NOT need permission from Governors or Mayors to go where their jobs demand they go.
DHS is tasked by the law which was created by Congress to protect federal buildings. If they do not, then they are derelict in their duties, (like the Governors and Mayors in these radicalized states and cities). They do not need permission from anyone to perform this duty.
Further, "Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secret Service is authorized to detect and arrest any person who violates—
… any of the laws of the United States relating to electronic fund transfer frauds, access device frauds, false identification documents or devices, and any fraud or other criminal or unlawful activity in or against any federally insured financial institution; except that the authority conferred by this paragraph shall be exercised subject to the agreement of the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security and shall not affect the authority of any other Federal law enforcement agency with respect to those laws.
So, that means if someone in a city commits fraud with a wire transfer or uses false ID to commit a crime, that is a violation of federal law, and federal agents have to ask NO ONE for permission to go in and arrest the criminal."
18 U.S. Code §3056 Powers, authorities, and duties of United States Secret Service
http://djhjmedia.com/rich/federal-agents-do-not-need-permission-to-go-into-cities-to-enforce-federal-laws-heres-why/
ATF is supposed to "target, identify, and dismantle criminal enterprises with ties to violent crime, that traffic illicit liquor or contraband tobacco in interstate commerce; seize and deny their access to assets and funds; and prevent their encroachment into the legitimate alcohol or tobacco industry."
The FBI is charged with finding and jailing criminals of all sorts, including local and foreign intelligence crimes, and finding and jailing terrorists of all sorts and is supposed to work with the Department of Justice to accomplish those goals.
The DEA or drug enforcement agency can be deployed at any time, anywhere, also without permission
U.S. Marshals, also deployed in Portland: "the Marshals occupy a uniquely central position in the federal justice system. It is the enforcement arm of the federal courts, and as such, it is involved in virtually every federal law enforcement initiative.
Presidentially appointed U.S. Marshals direct the activities of 94 districts — one for each federal judicial district. More than 3,752 Deputy Marshals and Criminal Investigators form the backbone of the agency. Among their many duties, they apprehend more than half of all federal fugitives, protect the federal judiciary, operate the Witness Security Program, transport federal prisoners and seize property acquired by criminals through illegal activities."
Since a federal courthouse in Portland was firebombed there, with people locked inside by the rioters from the OUTSIDE this is definitely part of their jurisdiction.
In NYC, as in Chicago, the gang violence needs to be controlled. The federal agencies are already there.
Cuomo and DiBlasio are just killing more people if they can find a judge anywhere who will take this issue up in court.
TexChik · F
@MistyCee it’s called a war now when corrupt libs who keep demanding more money get asked to prove the need and prove it’s going where it was meant ? Can you say Elijah Cummings? Sorry there had to be a few checks and balances ....maybe Pelosi can spew that stormtrooper crap of hers a little more . There’s probably a few Jews left she hasn’t offended 🤷🏻♀️😂
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
latinbutterfly · F
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@latinbutterfly the US has seen it's biggest decline in global influence in it's history. It's long term economic recovery was sold out for a short term boom. And we've hit levels of science denial that were capable of turning advanced nations into third world countries if left uncorrected long enough.
latinbutterfly · F
@Jill1990 Good point, lol.
Brianthesnail · 56-60, M
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
@Brianthesnail The Cubans are building an airport in NY?
Brianthesnail · 56-60, M
@Crazywaterspring better send people in, just in case !
windinhishair · 61-69, M
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
I don't really know what that means. I'd need more details.
AbbeyRhode · F
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
tenente · 100+, M
i can't see the difference 🤔 can you see the difference? [media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW0qlymrmOY]