Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Could Co vid19 be considered WMD?

4meAndyou · F Best Comment
It is not. Biological weapons, which you believe this might possibly be...always show evidence of tampering in their genome. This one was not tampered, and it's structure is...or was...natural. This was something geneticists looked at quite early on.

What it actually is, was a study by Wuhan virologists that went very, badly wrong. They were collecting a LOT of bats and they were actively studying the coronavirus in the feces of bats. On January 27th or shortly thereafter Khenpal1 posted video of this on one of my posts.

What they discovered was accidentally released, probably in November of 2019. The head of that virology lab is STILL denying that they were sloppy and/or careless, but it is well known that facility operates at Level 2, and this virus should be kept in a Level 4 lab to contain it...just like ebola.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Keepitsimple · 51-55, F
Yes. I think China was probably trying to get their population under control and it wound up destroying the whole world. Who knows...😉
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Keepitsimple With 'flu-like' symptoms? Not very effective. 💁
Keepitsimple · 51-55, F
@Graylight it seems like it is doing the trick to me.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Keepitsimple Yeah, I guess they've got the market on the long con....
😉
SW-User
It's interesting how "anti malaria drugs" and drugs to treat hiv are apparently working so well in combating covid-19, it certainly gives us reason yo believe that it is a laboratory born disease
America doesn't really have a good track record with recognizing wmd's.
cycleman · 61-69, M
No.

If it was intentionally released in scores of major cities all around the world but not in China, then that would certainly raise a few eyebrows.
I bet you are the same people who think 9/11 is an inside job
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
smiler2012 · 56-60
patience57 suppose if any rogue state had the technology i guess it could be made as a dirty bomb
Tracos · 51-55, M
if a tsunami hits, would water be considered a WMD?
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Tracos weap·on of mass de·struc·tion
noun
noun: weapon of mass destruction; plural noun: weapons of mass destruction
a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction.
Tracos · 51-55, M
@Graylight hmmm... .I guess that rules out volcanoes too
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Tracos I'm guessing. Had to look it up myself.
dondon · M
if you weaponize it yes, definately not in this case though.
Graylight · 51-55, F
If it were being used as a weapon, yes.

 
Post Comment