This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
4meAndyou · F
Unfortunate. He is a military man who consistently had trouble in his relationships with his superiors, always thinking he knew better. He was bound to run into trouble throughout his service while struggling with that attitude, and he had a history of same.
I believe that since he already had the tendency to buck and criticize his command, he was easily led astray during the recent debacle. And I believe that his Ukrainian half was struggling with the possibility that Ukraine might not receive the military aid they desired, and he decided to buck the Commander in Chief. Why would his direct boss in the NSA want to keep him on after that?
Military men make mistakes all the time...but this one was very public. He has also shown that he is a potential security risk.
I believe that since he already had the tendency to buck and criticize his command, he was easily led astray during the recent debacle. And I believe that his Ukrainian half was struggling with the possibility that Ukraine might not receive the military aid they desired, and he decided to buck the Commander in Chief. Why would his direct boss in the NSA want to keep him on after that?
Military men make mistakes all the time...but this one was very public. He has also shown that he is a potential security risk.