Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

US Senate votes in favor of no new witness 's or evdince in President Trumps Impeachment Trial! Let the crying commence!

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
lou502008 · 61-69, M
Chucky Boy Schumer is already crying Foul!
Graylight · 51-55, F
@lou502008 A trial where willing witnesses were blocked and any evidence was disallowed. Wow, I wonder why.
lou502008 · 61-69, M
@Graylight Boo Hoo!

The House should of done it's Homework!
Graylight · 51-55, F
@lou502008 It did, idjit. That homework wasn't allowed in. Welcome to reality.
lou502008 · 61-69, M
@Graylight the reality is, the Dems dropped the ball again!
Graylight · 51-55, F
@lou502008 No, they didn't. They were ready, the evidence is there and the argument was sound. And they dropped nothing. They ensured the GOP loses either way on this. It was the question of a quick but painful course reversal or a long, slow, embarrassing death. Guess which they chose?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Graylight Stupidity?
Northwest · M
@lou502008

[quote]the reality is, the Dems dropped the ball again![/quote]

Not even close. Here's what Senator Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said today:

[quote]I don't need to hear any more evidence to decide that the president did what he's charged with doing. [b][i][u]So if you've got eight witnesses saying that you left the scene of an accident, you don't need nine[/u][/i][/b]....

I think it's appropriate for me as a United States senator to say, 'Mr. President, you shouldn't do that.' But that doesn't mean that I should take it upon myself to vote, to remove him from office and take him off the ballot. I think that's up to the people.
[/quote]

It's not a question of whether they believe he did not do it, it's that they're not willing to vote country ahead of party.